Fitness costs of butterfly oviposition on a lethal non-native plant in a mixed native and non-native plant community

被引:0
|
作者
Mifuyu Nakajima
Carol L. Boggs
Sallie Bailey
Jennifer Reithel
Timothy Paape
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Biology
[2] Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory,Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
[3] Forestry Commission,undefined
[4] University of Zurich,undefined
来源
Oecologia | 2013年 / 172卷
关键词
Brassicaceae; Evolutionary trap; Host mismatch; Larval survival; Pieridae;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Non-native plants may be unpalatable or toxic, but have oviposition cues similar to native plants used by insects. The herbivore will then oviposit on the plant, but the offspring will be unable to develop. While such instances have been described previously, the fitness costs at the population level in the wild due to the presence of the lethal host have not been quantified, for this or other related systems. We quantified the fitness cost in the field for the native butterfly Pieris macdunnoughii in the presence of the non-native crucifer Thlaspi arvense, based on the spatial distributions of host plants, female butterflies and eggs in the habitat and the survival of the larvae in the wild. We found that 2.9 % of eggs were laid on T. arvense on average, with a survival probability of 0, yielding a calculated fitness cost of 3.0 % (95 % confidence interval 1.7–3.6 %) due to the presence of the non-native in the plant community. Survival probability to the pre-pupal stage for eggs laid on two native crucifers averaged 1.6 % over 2 years. The magnitude of the fitness cost will vary temporally and spatially as a function of the relative abundance of the non-native plant. We propose that the fine-scale spatial structure of the plant community relative to the butterflies’ dispersal ability, combined with the females’ broad habitat use, contributes to the fitness costs associated with the non-native plant and the resulting evolutionary trap.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 832
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Delineating the calling pattern of Oecanthus indicus from native and non-native plant species
    Sunny, Anupam
    Singh, Purnima
    Diwakar, Swati
    Sharma, Gyan Prakash
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [42] Plant native: comparing biodiversity benefits, ecosystem services provisioning, and plant performance of native and non-native plants in urban horticulture
    Tartaglia, Elena S.
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 27 (06) : 2587 - 2611
  • [43] Direct and Indirect Influence of Non-Native Neighbours on Pollination and Fruit Production of a Native Plant
    Montero-Castano, Ana
    Vila, Montserrat
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [44] SynCom-specific effects of native and non-native commensal bacteria on their host plant
    Wippel, K.
    Niu, Y.
    Schulze-Lefert, P.
    Garrido-Oter, R.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2021, 34 (12) : 3 - 3
  • [45] Contrasting responses of soil nematode communities to native and non-native woody plant expansion
    Guadalupe Peralta
    Nicole L. Schon
    Ian A. Dickie
    Mark G. St. John
    Kate H. Orwin
    Gregor W. Yeates
    Duane A. Peltzer
    Oecologia, 2019, 190 : 891 - 899
  • [46] Costs and Benefits of Native Language Similarity for Non-native Word Learning
    Marian, Viorica
    Bartolotti, James
    van den Berg, Aimee
    Hayakawa, Sayuri
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [47] Comparing transcription agreement on non-native English speech corpus between native and non-native annotators
    Ryu, Hyuksu
    Kim, Sunhee
    Chung, Minhwa
    13TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2012 (INTERSPEECH 2012), VOLS 1-3, 2012, : 2363 - 2366
  • [48] Medieval castles as centers of spread of non-native plant species
    Dehnen-Schmutz, K
    PLANT INVASIONS: ECOLOGICAL MECHANISMS AND HUMAN RESPONSES, 1998, : 307 - 312
  • [49] Group effects of a non-native plant invasion on rodent abundance
    Kluever, Bryan M.
    Smith, Trinity N.
    Gese, Eric M.
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (01):