Long-term results of pediculo-body fixation and posterolateral fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis

被引:9
|
作者
Antonino Zagra
Fabrizio Giudici
Leone Minoia
Andrea Saverio Corriero
Luigi Zagra
机构
[1] Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute,Department of Spinal Surgery
来源
European Spine Journal | 2009年 / 18卷
关键词
Spondylolisthesis; Spinal fusion; Back pain; Radicular pain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Grob et al. (Eur Spine J 5:281–285, 1996) illustrated a new fixation technique in inveterate cases of grade 2–3 spondylolisthesis (degenerative or spondylolytic): a fusion without reduction of the spondylolisthesis. Fixation of the segment was achieved by two cancellous bone screws inserted bilaterally through the pedicles of the lower vertebra into the body of the upper slipped vertebra. Since 1998 we have been using this technique according to the authors’ indications: symptomatic spondylolisthesis with at least 25% anterior slippage and advanced disc degeneration. Afterwards this technique was used also in spondylolisthesis with low reduction of the disc height and slippage less than 25%. In every case we performed postero-lateral fusion and fixation with two AO 6.5 Ø thread 16 mm cancellous screws. From 1998 to 2002 we performed 62 fusions for spondylolisthesis with this technique: 28 males (45.16%) and 34 females (54.84%), mean age 45 years (14–72 years). The slipped vertebra was L5 in 57 cases (92%), L4 in 2 cases (3.2%), L3 in 1 case (1.6%), combined L4 and L5 in 2 cases (3.2%). In all cases there was an ontogenetic spondylolisthesis with lysis. Lumbar pain was present in 22 patients and lumbar-radicular pain was present in 40 patients. The mean preoperative VAS was 6.2 (range 5–8) for lumbar pain, and 5.5 (range 4–7) for leg pain. The fusion area was L5–S1 in 53 cases (85.5%), L3–L4 in 1 case (1.6%), L4–S1 in 8 cases (12.9%). A decompression of the spinal canal by laminectomy was performed in 33 procedures (53%). When possible a bone graft was done from the removed neural arc, and from the posterior iliac crest in the other cases. The mean blood loss was about 254 ml (100–1,000). The mean operative time was 75 min (range 60–90). The results obtained by computerized analysis at follow-up at least 5 years after surgery showed a significant improvement in preoperative symptoms. The patients were asymptomatic in 52 cases (83.9%); strained-back pain was present in 8 cases (12.9%), and there was persistent lumbar-radicular pain in 2 cases (3.2%). The mean ODI score was 2.6%, the mean VAS back pain was 1.3, the mean VAS leg pain 0.7. Some complications were observed: a nerve root compression by a screw invasion of intervertebral foramen, resolved by screw removal; an iliac artery compression by a lateral exit screw from pediculo, resolved by screw removal; a deep iliac vein phlebitis with thrombosis caused by external compression due to a wrong intraoperative position, treated by medicine. Two cases of synthesis mobilization and two cases of broken screws was detected. No cases of pseudoarthrosis and immediate or late superficial or deep infection were observed. The analysis of the long-term results of the spondylolisthesis surgical treatment with direct pediculo-body screw fixation and postero-lateral fusion gave a very satisfactory response. The technique is reliable in allowing an optimal primary stability, creating the best biomechanical conditions to obtain a solid fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 155
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults - A comparison of clinical results
    Kim, NH
    Lee, JW
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (08) : 812 - 816
  • [33] Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of L4 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Kuraishi, Shugo
    Takahashi, Jun
    Mukaiyama, Keijiro
    Shimizu, Masayuki
    Ikegami, Shota
    Futatsugi, Toshimasa
    Hirabayashi, Hiroki
    Ogihara, Nobuhide
    Hashidate, Hiroyuki
    Tateiwa, Yutaka
    Kinoshita, Hisatoshi
    Kato, Hiroyuki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (01) : 143 - 152
  • [34] Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis - A prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis
    Kornblum, MB
    Fischgrund, JS
    Herkowitz, HN
    Abraham, DA
    Berkower, DL
    Ditkoff, JS
    SPINE, 2004, 29 (07) : 726 - 733
  • [36] Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Le, Hai
    Schairer, William W.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Qamirani, Erion
    Hu, Serena S.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 5 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [37] Anterior lumbar inter-body fusion with instrumentation compared with posterolateral fusion for low grade isthmic-spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Varun
    Singh, Raj Kumar
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2016, 82 (01): : 23 - 30
  • [38] Long-term results of the direct repair of spondylolisthesis
    Fabrizio Giudici
    L. Minoia
    M. Archetti
    A. S. Corriero
    A. Zagra
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 115 - 120
  • [39] Long-term results of the direct repair of spondylolisthesis
    Giudici, Fabrizio
    Minoia, L.
    Archetti, M.
    Corriero, A. S.
    Zagra, A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 : 115 - 120
  • [40] Posterolateral fusion using laminectomy bone chips in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Kho, Victor Ka-Siong
    Chen, Wen-Chih
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 32 (01) : 115 - 119