Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities

被引:0
|
作者
Niklas A. Kornder
Jose Cappelletto
Benjamin Mueller
Margaretha J. L. Zalm
Stephanie J. Martinez
Mark J. A. Vermeij
Jef Huisman
Jasper M. de Goeij
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics
[2] University of Southampton,Maritime Robotics Laboratory, Southampton Marine and Maritime Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science
[3] Universidad Simón Bolívar,Grupo de I+D en Mecatrónica
[4] CARMABI Foundation,undefined
来源
Coral Reefs | 2021年 / 40卷
关键词
Habitat complexity; Biomass; Standing stock; Community cover composition; Relative abundance; Sponges; Algae; Coelobites; Photogrammetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A paramount challenge in coral reef ecology is to estimate the abundance and composition of the communities residing in such complex ecosystems. Traditional 2D projected surface cover estimates neglect the 3D structure of reefs and reef organisms, overlook communities residing in cryptic reef habitats (e.g., overhangs, cavities), and thus may fail to represent biomass estimates needed to assess trophic ecology and reef function. Here, we surveyed the 3D surface cover, biovolume, and biomass (i.e., ash-free dry weight) of all major benthic taxa on 12 coral reef stations on the island of Curaçao (Southern Caribbean) using structure-from-motion photogrammetry, coral point counts, in situ measurements, and elemental analysis. We then compared our 3D benthic community estimates to corresponding estimates of traditional 2D projected surface cover to explore the differences in benthic community composition using different metrics. Overall, 2D cover was dominated (52 ± 2%, mean ± SE) by non-calcifying phototrophs (macroalgae, turf algae, benthic cyanobacterial mats), but their contribution to total reef biomass was minor (3.2 ± 0.6%). In contrast, coral cover (32 ± 2%) more closely resembled coral biomass (27 ± 6%). The relative contribution of erect organisms, such as gorgonians and massive sponges, to 2D cover was twofold and 11-fold lower, respectively, than their contribution to reef biomass. Cryptic surface area (3.3 ± 0.2 m2 m−2planar reef) comprised half of the total reef substrate, rendering two thirds of coralline algae and almost all encrusting sponges (99.8%) undetected in traditional assessments. Yet, encrusting sponges dominated reef biomass (35 ± 18%). Based on our quantification of exposed and cryptic reef communities using different metrics, we suggest adjustments to current monitoring approaches and highlight ramifications for evaluating the ecological contributions of different taxa to overall reef function. To this end, our metric conversions can complement other benthic assessments to generate non-invasive estimates of the biovolume, biomass, and elemental composition (i.e., standing stocks of organic carbon and nitrogen) of Caribbean coral reef communities.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1153
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 21/2D or 3D?
    Roth, S
    Küster, B
    Sura, H
    KUNSTSTOFFE-PLAST EUROPE, 2004, 94 (07): : 65 - 67
  • [32] 2D and 3D on demand
    Philippi, Anne
    F & M; Feinwerktechnik, Mikrotechnik, Messtechnik, 1998, 106 (06): : 412 - 414
  • [33] From 2D to 3D
    Steven De Feyter
    Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3 (1) : 14 - 15
  • [34] 2D and 3D Characterization of PtNi Nanowire Electrode Composition and Structure
    Shulda, Sarah
    Weker, Johanna Nelson
    Ngo, Chilan
    Alia, Shaun M.
    Mauger, Scott A.
    Neyerlin, K. C.
    Pivovar, Bryan S.
    Pylypenko, Svitlana
    ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS, 2019, 2 (01) : 525 - 534
  • [35] Weak lensing reconstructions in 2D and 3D: implications for cluster studies
    Leonard, Adrienne
    Lanusse, Francois
    Starck, Jean-Luc
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 449 (01) : 1146 - 1157
  • [36] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
    Pais, Ana Sofia
    Reis, Sandra
    Laranjo, Mafalda
    Caramelo, Francisco
    Silva, Fatima
    Botelho, Maria Filomena
    Almeida-Santos, Teresa
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [37] 2D versus 3D MRI of osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research
    Sven S. Walter
    Benjamin Fritz
    Richard Kijowski
    Jan Fritz
    Skeletal Radiology, 2023, 52 : 2211 - 2224
  • [38] In vitro systems to study nephropharmacology: 2D versus 3D models
    Sanchez-Romero, Natalia
    Schophuizen, Carolien M. S.
    Gimenez, Ignacio
    Masereeuw, Rosalinde
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 790 : 36 - 45
  • [39] 2D versus 3D MRI of osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research
    Walter, Sven S.
    Fritz, Benjamin
    Kijowski, Richard
    Fritz, Jan
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (11) : 2211 - 2224
  • [40] Scenes in the Human Brain: Comparing 2D versus 3D Representations
    Groen, Iris I. A.
    Baker, Chris I.
    NEURON, 2019, 101 (01) : 8 - 10