Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture

被引:0
|
作者
Christopher P. Chung
Richard Miskimins
Thomas J. Kuehl
Paul M. Yandell
Bobby L. Shull
机构
[1] Scott and White Healthcare/Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine,Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Scott and White Healthcare/Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics
[3] Scott and White Healthcare/Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine,Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine
来源
关键词
Uterosacral ligament suspension; Suture materials; Vaginal prolapse surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 227
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] PERMANENT VERSUS DELAYED ABSORBABLE SUTURE IN UTEROSACRAL LIGMENT SUSPENSION FOR THE APICAL COMPARTMENT: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY WITH A 24 MONTHS MEAN FOLLOW-UP
    Urzua, M. J.
    Rondini, C.
    Alvarez, J.
    Kaplan, F.
    Troncoso, F. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 : S20 - S21
  • [22] Bladder stone formation on permanent suture material ten years after laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension
    Jang, H.
    Park, E. K.
    Han, D. S.
    Kim, C. J.
    Lee, Y. S.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (03): : 472 - 474
  • [23] Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
    Padoa, Anna
    Ziv, Yuval
    Tsviban, Anna
    Tomashev, Roni
    Smorgick, Noam
    Fligelman, Tal
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 283 : 112 - 117
  • [24] Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups
    Su, S.
    Murillo, A.
    Zuo, S.
    Ackenbom, M.
    Bradley, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S481 - S481
  • [25] PERMANENT VERSUS ABSORBABLE SUTURE MATERIAL FOR SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION: DOES IT MATTER?
    Padoa, A.
    Dinkovitch, R. Tomashev
    Tsviban, A.
    Fligelman, T. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S98 - S98
  • [26] Functional and anatomic comparison of 2 versus 3 suture placement for uterosacral ligament suspension: a cadaver study
    Montoya, T. Ignacio
    Dillon, Shena J.
    Balgobin, Sunil
    Wai, Clifford Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (05)
  • [27] Impact of permanent versus absorbable suture in vaginal suspension surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse
    Pollack, B. L.
    Popiel, P.
    Drugge, E.
    Bibi, M.
    Pollack, S.
    Friedman, R.
    Alishahian, L.
    Bielawski, A.
    Sacks, A.
    Lebron, K.
    Phillips, D.
    Rubino, S. R.
    Toaff, M.
    Khan, R.
    Khan, E.
    Marioutina, M.
    Gorgy, M.
    Grimes, C. L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (03) : S1281 - S1282
  • [28] Low risk of ureteral obstruction with "deep" (dorsal/posterior) uterosacral ligament suture placement for transvaginal apical suspension
    Aronson, MP
    Aronson, PK
    Howard, AE
    Morse, AN
    Baker, SP
    Young, SB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (05) : 1530 - 1536
  • [29] Recto-cutaneous fistula with transmigration of the suture: a rare delayed complication of sacrospinous ligament suspension
    Kadam, P.
    Han, H. C.
    Koh, W. S.
    Singh, P.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 338 - 338
  • [30] Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
    C. Emi Bretschneider
    Kimberly Kenton
    Elizabeth J. Geller
    Jennifer M. Wu
    Catherine A. Matthews
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 2035 - 2041