Downstream rivals’ competition, bargaining, and welfare

被引:0
|
作者
Xingtang Wang
Jie Li
机构
[1] Jinan University,Institute of Industrial Economics
[2] Jinan University,Institute of Industrial Organization and Regulation
来源
Journal of Economics | 2020年 / 131卷
关键词
Competition behavior; Vertical structure; Competition mode; Decentralized bargaining; D21; L12; L13; L22; L81; M1;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyze the effect of downstream competition (or cooperation) in the presence of decentralized bargaining between two downstream firms and an upstream monopolist over a two-part tariff input price. The major findings are as follows: (i) the relationship between the profits of the upstream monopolist (resp. the downstream firms) and the intensity of competition is U-shaped (resp. inverted U-shaped), irrespective of the competition modes in the downstream product market; (ii) if the intensity of competition is sufficiently high, the downstream firms’ profits are higher under Bertrand competition, whereas if the intensity of competition is sufficiently low, the downstream firms’ profits are higher under Cournot competition; and (iii) a market under Cournot competition is more efficient than a market under Bertrand competition, in the sense that both consumer surplus and social welfare are higher in the case of the former.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 75
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BARGAINING AND COMPETITION .1. CHARACTERIZATION
    GALE, D
    ECONOMETRICA, 1986, 54 (04) : 785 - 806
  • [42] Downstream merger and welfare in a bilateral oligopoly
    Symeonidis, George
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2010, 28 (03) : 230 - 243
  • [43] Robbing rivals: interference foraging competition reflects female reproductive competition in a cooperative mammal
    Sharpe, Lynda L.
    Rubow, Janneke
    Cherry, Michael I.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 112 : 229 - 236
  • [44] Can More Information About Rivals' Costs Decrease Welfare?
    Brito, Duarte
    Pereira, Pedro
    Vareda, Joao
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2016, 84 (02): : 251 - 269
  • [45] POTENTIAL COMPETITION, ACTUAL COMPETITION, AND ECONOMIC WELFARE
    DASGUPTA, P
    STIGLITZ, JE
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1988, 32 (2-3) : 569 - 577
  • [46] Power and welfare in bargaining for coalition structure formation
    Fatima, Shaheen
    Michalak, Tomasz P.
    Wooldridge, Michael
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (05) : 899 - 930
  • [47] Welfare analysis of privatization in a mixed market with bargaining
    Jiang, Lily
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2006, 24 (03) : 395 - 406
  • [48] Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster
    Bretman, Amanda
    Fricke, Claudia
    Hetherington, Primrose
    Stone, Rachel
    Chapman, Tracey
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 317 - 321
  • [49] THE IMPORTANCE OF OTHERS WELFARE IN EVALUATING BARGAINING OUTCOMES
    CORFMAN, KP
    LEHMANN, DR
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (01) : 124 - 137
  • [50] Power and welfare in bargaining for coalition structure formation
    Shaheen Fatima
    Tomasz P. Michalak
    Michael Wooldridge
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2016, 30 : 899 - 930