Comparison of Different Digestion Methods for Total Decomposition of Siliceous and Organic Environmental Samples

被引:0
|
作者
Yuh-Chang Sun
Po-Hsiang Chi
Mei-Yun Shiue
机构
[1] National Tsing-Hua University,Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center
[2] National Tsing-Hua University,Department of Nuclear Science
来源
Analytical Sciences | 2001年 / 17卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A comparison was made of different digestion methods for the total decomposition of siliceous and organically environmental samples prior to their analysis by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). In the present study, three different digestion methods, including microwave-assisted, hot plate heating and pressurized digestion (pressure bomb), were employed for the determination of nine heavy metals, i.e. Ag, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in sediment, soil, sludge and oil. The investigation of different combinations of acids through their analytical performance demonstrated that HCl plays a vital role in the determination of silver. The combination of HNO3 and HCl possesses more reactive ability in oxidizing organic matter. The recoveries of all elements of interest in sediment (NIST 2704) obtained by different digestion methods were found to be 86% to 113%, while microwave assisted digestion with various combinations of HNO3–HCl–HF and HNO3–HClO4–HF was considered to be a viable alternative to the conventional digestion systems because of its more intensive reaction conditions. The analytical results of four certified reference materials with different matrices, including sediment (GBW 07305), soil (GBW 07411), sludge (BCR R-143) and oil (NIST 1085a), by the microwave-assisted acid digestion method indicated that the recoveries of all elements of interest were more than 85% and the throughput of applied analytical method could be elevated significantly.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1395 / 1399
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of different methods for total bacteria RNA extraction
    Luo, L.-X., 1948, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China (29):
  • [42] Comparison of Urinary Total Proteins by Four Different Methods
    Yalamati P.
    Karra M.L.
    Bhongir A.V.
    Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2016, 31 (4) : 463 - 467
  • [43] Approach to the content of total extractable phenolic compounds from different food samples by comparison of chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods
    Escarpa, A
    González, MC
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2001, 427 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [44] Comparison of two digestion methods for determining total phosphorus in farm canal water
    Chen, Ming
    Daroub, Samira H.
    Nadal, Viviana
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2006, 37 (15-20) : 2351 - 2363
  • [45] Project study: Comparison of digestion methods for determination of the total metal content in dust samples - Part 3: Statistical evaluation of the proficiency tests
    Schwank, T.
    Pitzke, K.
    Gusbeth, K.
    Breuer, D.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2019, 79 (04): : 114 - 119
  • [46] Gas chromatographic methods for the determination of trace organic pollutants in environmental samples
    Zenkevich, I. G.
    Drugov, Yu. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 68 (10) : 845 - 861
  • [47] RAPID, AUTOMATED METHODS TO ANALYZE FOR ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL-SAMPLES
    KRAHN, MM
    BROWN, DW
    WIGREN, CA
    BURROWS, DG
    MACLEOD, WD
    CHAN, SL
    OCEANS 89, VOL 1-6: AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ADDRESSING METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING THE GLOBAL OCEAN, 1989, : 397 - 401
  • [48] Gas chromatographic methods for the determination of trace organic pollutants in environmental samples
    I. G. Zenkevich
    Yu. S. Drugov
    Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 68 : 845 - 861
  • [49] Comparison of different methods for the assessment of the environmental gamma dose
    Losana, MC
    Magnoni, M
    Righino, F
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 97 (04) : 333 - 336
  • [50] Comparison of methods to homogenize ricotta cheese samples for total solids determination
    Mangione, G.
    Caccamo, M.
    Farina, G.
    Licitra, G.
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (01): : 5 - 8