Viability of Noether Symmetry of F(R) Theory of Gravity

Recently, we have explored vices and virtues of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$R^{\frac{3}{2}}$\end{document} term in the action which has in-built Noether symmetry and anticipated that a linear term might improve the situation (Sarkar et al., arXiv:1201.2987 [astro-ph.CO], 2012). In the absence of a conserved current it is extremely difficult to obtain an analytical solution of the said fourth order theory of gravity in the presence of a linear term. Here, we therefore enlarge the configuration space by including a scalar field in addition and also taking some of the anisotropic models (in the absence of a scalar field) into account. We observe that Noether symmetry remains obscure and it does not even reproduce the one that already exists in the literature (Sanyal, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 37:407, 2005). However, there exists in general, a conserved current for F(R) theory of gravity in the presence of a non-minimally coupled scalar field (Sanyal, Phys. Lett. B, 624:81, 2005; Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 25:2667, 2010), which simplifies the field equations considerably. Here, we briefly expatiate the non-Noether conserved current and show that indeed the situation is modified.