Four loss estimates for the Gorkha M7.8 earthquake, April 25, 2015, before and after it occurred

被引:0
|
作者
Max Wyss
机构
[1] International Centre for Earth Simulation Foundation,
来源
Natural Hazards | 2017年 / 86卷
关键词
Earthquake risk; Gorkha 2015 earthquake; Nepal seismic risk;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The number of fatalities in the Gorkha M7.8 earthquake of April 25, 2015, has been estimated at four different times as follows. In March 2005, the fatality estimate in this journal was 21,000–42,000 with an assumed magnitude of 8.1 (Wyss in Nat Hazard 34:305–314, 2005). Within hours after this earthquake, the estimated number of fatalities by QLARM was 2000–10,000 using a point source model and M7.9. Four hours later, the estimate was 20,000–100,000, based on a first approximation line source model and assuming children were in school. Children out of school, as this was a weekend day, reduced the fatalities by approximately a factor of two, but was not taken into account for the calculation. The final line source estimates based on M7.8 and M7.9 calculates 800–9300 and 1100–11,200 fatalities, respectively. The official count is about 10,000 fatalities. These estimates were performed using QLARM, a computer tool and world data set on the distribution of people in settlements and containing a model of the buildings present. It is argued here that the loss estimate 10 years before the event being within a factor of 2.1 of the eventual loss count is useful for mitigation planning. With varying quality of information on the source and the attenuation, the estimates of fatalities shortly after the earthquake are accurate enough to be useful for first responders. With full knowledge of the rupture properties and the regional attenuation of seismic waves, the numbers of human losses are estimated correctly.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2015 M7.8 Nepal earthquake
    Yiyan Zhou
    Jian Yang
    Fuying Zhu
    Fanfan Su
    Liangchen Hu
    Wenbo Zhai
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2017, (04) : 221 - 228
  • [22] RETRACTED: Field evidence of Gorkha earthquake of 25 April (7.8 M) and Kodari earthquake of 12 May 2015 (7.2 M) in Nepal (Retracted Article)
    Kumar, Arun
    Singh, M. Devachandra
    Roy, L. Someshwor
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2017, 8 (02) : 2023 - 2037
  • [23] Transient poroelastic stress coupling between the 2015 M7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake and its M7.3 aftershock
    Tung, S.
    Masterlark, T.
    Dovovan, T.
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2018, 733 : 119 - 131
  • [24] Background and reflections on Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015
    Liang, Guilan
    Zhou, Niandong
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 81 (02) : 1385 - 1392
  • [25] Background and reflections on Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015
    Guilan Liang
    Niandong Zhou
    Natural Hazards, 2016, 81 : 1385 - 1392
  • [26] Ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2015 M7.8 Nepal earthquake
    Yiyan Zhou
    Jian Yang
    Fuying Zhu
    Fanfan Su
    Liangchen Hu
    Wenbo Zhai
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2017, 8 (04) : 221 - 228
  • [27] Using structural damage statistics to derive macroseismic intensity within the Kathmandu valley for the 2015 M7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake
    McGowan, S. M.
    Jaiswal, K. S.
    Wald, D. J.
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2017, 714 : 158 - 172
  • [28] Field evidence of Gorkha earthquake of 25 April (7.8 M) and Kodari earthquake of 12 May 2015 (7.2 M) in Nepal (vol 8, pg 2038, 2017)
    Kumar, A.
    Singh, M. Devachandra
    Roy, L. Someshwor
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2017, 8 (02) : 2039 - 2039
  • [29] The 12 May 2015 Kodari earthquake (Mw 7.3) in Central Nepal: delayed triggering by the 25 April 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Mw 7.8)
    Yadav, Rajeev Kumar
    Kundu, Bhaskar
    Gahalaut, Kalpna
    Gahalaut, V. K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2018, 114 (07): : 1534 - 1539
  • [30] Structural performance and associated lessons to be learned from world earthquakes in Nepal after 25 April 2015 (MW 7.8) Gorkha earthquake
    Gautam, Dipendra
    Chaulagain, Hemchandra
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2016, 68 : 222 - 243