Barriers and facilitators to collaborative care implementation within the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program

被引:0
|
作者
LePoire, Erin [1 ]
Joseph, Molly [1 ]
Heald, Ashley [1 ]
Gadbois, Danielle [2 ]
Jones, Amy [2 ]
Russo, Joan [3 ]
Bowen, Deborah J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, AIMS Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] New York State Off Mental Hlth, Albany, NY USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Collaborative care; Implementation; Barriers to implementation; DEPRESSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10909-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Since 2015, the New York State Office of Mental Health has provided state primary care clinics with outreach, free training and technical assistance, and the opportunity to bill Medicaid for the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) as part of its Collaborative Care Medicaid Program. This study aims to describe the characteristics of New York State primary care clinics at each step of CoCM implementation, and the barriers and facilitators to CoCM implementation for the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program.Methods In this mixed-methods study, clinics were categorized into RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) steps. Clinics were sent a survey, which included questions related to payer mix, funding sources, billing codes used, and patient population demographics. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clinic representatives, focusing on barriers or facilitators clinics experienced affecting their progression to the next RE-AIM step.Results One thousand ninety-nine surveys were sent to primary care clinics across New York State, with 107 (9.7%) completing a survey. Significant differences were observed among the different RE-AIM steps for multiple demographic variables including primary payer, percentage of patients with a diagnose of depression or anxiety, and percent of behavioral health services that are reimbursed, in addition to others. Three main themes regarding barriers and facilitators to implementing CoCM for New York State Medicaid billing emerged from 31 qualitative interviews: (1) Billing requirements, (2) Reimbursement rates, and (3) Buy-in to CoCM.Conclusions Survey data align with what we would expect to see demographically in NYS primary care clinics. Qualitative data indicated that CoCM billing requirements/structure and reimbursement rates were perceived as barriers to providing CoCM, particularly with New York State Medicaid, and that buy-in, which included active involvement from organizational leaders and providers that understand the Collaborative Care model were facilitators. Having dedicated staff to manage billing and data reporting is one way clinics minimize barriers, however, there appeared to be a disconnect between what clinics can bill for and the reimbursed amount several clinics are receiving, illustrating the need for stronger billing workflows and continued refinement of billing options across different payers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers and Facilitators of Linkage to HIV Primary Care in New York City
    Bauman, Laurie J.
    Braunstein, Sarah
    Calderon, Yvette
    Chhabra, Rosy
    Cutler, Blayne
    Leider, Jason
    Rivera, Angelic
    Sclafane, Jamie
    Tsoi, Benjamin
    Watnick, Dana
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2013, 64 : S20 - S26
  • [22] Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State
    Moise, Nathalie
    Shah, Ravi N.
    Essock, Susan
    Jones, Amy
    Carruthers, Jay
    Handley, Margaret A.
    Peccoralo, Lauren
    Sederer, Lloyd
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [23] Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State
    Nathalie Moise
    Ravi N. Shah
    Susan Essock
    Amy Jones
    Jay Carruthers
    Margaret A. Handley
    Lauren Peccoralo
    Lloyd Sederer
    Implementation Science, 13
  • [24] Collaborative Depression Care in a Safety Net Medical Home: Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Improvement
    Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
    Dunn-Lombard, Donisha
    Harden-Barrios, Jewel
    Lefante, John J.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2016, 19 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [25] The New York City Palliative Care Quality Improvement Collaborative
    Gould, David A.
    Lynn, Joanne
    Helper, Deborah
    Myers, Sarah K.
    Simon, Lin
    Holmes, Hollis
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2007, 33 (06): : 307 - 316
  • [26] Implementation of the GermanIMPACT collaborative care program: A qualitative study on the perspective of care managers and supervisors
    Bjerregaard, Frederike
    Zech, Julia
    Frank, Fabian
    Hull, Michael
    Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter
    Holzel, Lars
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2018, 134 : 42 - 48
  • [27] The impact of the Medicaid high-risk ob care management program in New York State
    Park, Young Joo
    Weinberg, Stephen
    Cogan, Lindsay W.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (01) : 71 - 81
  • [28] Commercial managed care plans leaving the Medicaid Managed Care Program in New York State: Impact on quality and access
    Patrick J. Roohan
    Mary Beth Conroy
    Joseph P. Anarella
    Jacqueline M. Butch
    Foster C. Gesten
    Journal of Urban Health, 2000, 77 : 560 - 572
  • [29] Commercial managed care plans leaving the medicaid managed care program in New York State: Impact on quality and access
    Roohan, PJ
    Conroy, MB
    Anarella, JP
    Butch, JM
    Gesten, FC
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2000, 77 (04): : 560 - 572
  • [30] An Analysis of the Sustainability of a Collaborative Care Program Used to Deliver Integrated Mental Health Care Within a Micronesian Island State
    Haack, Sara A.
    Engelhard, Caitlin
    Kiyota, Tiffinie
    Alik, Tholman Ph
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 33 (6-7) : 786 - 788