Multi-criteria ranking across importance measures for stochastic networks

被引:0
|
作者
Rocco C.M. [1 ]
Barker K. [2 ]
González A.D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas
[2] School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 202 W. Boyd St., Rm. 124, Norman, 73019, OK
关键词
Component importance measures; Maximum flow; Multi-criteria decision analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s41872-023-00225-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The identification of the components important to the performance of a system provides insight into decisions such as which components to protect against failure or where to add redundancy to ensure system function. However, there are many perspectives on “importance,” including consideration of purely topological characteristics or consideration of how components enable flow in a network. And even within these broad perspectives, there are different ways to quantify importance. With this in mind, we offer a means to aggregate across different perspectives of importance to provide a more holistic ranking of components. We specifically consider networks with a stochastic nature to their capacities, as the calculation of importance can change based on such variability. We make use of a multi-criteria decision analysis technique under uncertainty, Fuzzy TOPSIS, to aggregate different importance measures given variability in network link capacities. Our proposed approach is illustrated with a case study based on the Colombia highway transportation network. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reliability and Safety (SRESA).
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy filtering ranking method for multi-criteria decision making
    Chang, Ting-Yu
    Ku, Cooper Cheng-Yuan
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 156
  • [32] Demo: Bostonhood: a multi-criteria platform for ranking city neighborhoods
    Kazepidou, Despoina
    Rousi, Maria
    Gkatziaki, Vasiliki
    Vakali, Athena
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART COMPUTING (SMARTCOMP 2018), 2018, : 288 - 290
  • [33] A multi-criteria decision approach for ranking unmet needs in healthcare
    Cleemput, Irina
    Devriese, Stephan
    Kohn, Laurence
    Westhovens, Rene
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (08) : 878 - 884
  • [34] Multi-criteria and multi-decision maker ranking of photovoltaic panels in Tunisia
    Bouzid, Mejda
    Elleuch, Mohamed Ali
    Frikha, Ahmed
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATION (DASA), 2021,
  • [35] An integrated model of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and stochastic programming for the evaluating and ranking of advanced manufacturing technologies
    Olfati, M.
    Yuan, W.
    Nasseri, S. H.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 17 (05): : 183 - 196
  • [36] Energy auditing of indoor swimming facility with multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking the proposed energy savings measures
    Jelena Nikolic
    Dusan Gordic
    Nebojsa Jurisevic
    Vladimir Vukasinovic
    Dobrica Milovanović
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2021, 14
  • [37] Energy auditing of indoor swimming facility with multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking the proposed energy savings measures
    Nikolic, Jelena
    Gordic, Dusan
    Jurisevic, Nebojsa
    Vukasinovic, Vladimir
    Milovanovic, Dobrica
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [38] Establishing Grey Criteria Similarity Measures for Multi-criteria Recommender Systems
    Hu, Yi-Chung
    Chiu, Yu-Jing
    Tsai, Jung-Fa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREY SYSTEM, 2018, 30 (01): : 194 - 207
  • [39] Multi-criteria decision making based on relative measures
    Meimei Xia
    Jian Chen
    Juliang Zhang
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 229 : 791 - 811
  • [40] Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS
    Jiang, H
    Eastman, JR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2000, 14 (02) : 173 - 184