Multi-criteria ranking across importance measures for stochastic networks

被引:0
|
作者
Rocco C.M. [1 ]
Barker K. [2 ]
González A.D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas
[2] School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 202 W. Boyd St., Rm. 124, Norman, 73019, OK
关键词
Component importance measures; Maximum flow; Multi-criteria decision analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s41872-023-00225-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The identification of the components important to the performance of a system provides insight into decisions such as which components to protect against failure or where to add redundancy to ensure system function. However, there are many perspectives on “importance,” including consideration of purely topological characteristics or consideration of how components enable flow in a network. And even within these broad perspectives, there are different ways to quantify importance. With this in mind, we offer a means to aggregate across different perspectives of importance to provide a more holistic ranking of components. We specifically consider networks with a stochastic nature to their capacities, as the calculation of importance can change based on such variability. We make use of a multi-criteria decision analysis technique under uncertainty, Fuzzy TOPSIS, to aggregate different importance measures given variability in network link capacities. Our proposed approach is illustrated with a case study based on the Colombia highway transportation network. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reliability and Safety (SRESA).
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RANKING THE IMPORTANCE OF MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION INDICATORS BASED ON THEIR TRANSITIVITY
    Ginevicius, Romualdas
    Nazarko, Joanicjusz
    Gedvilaite, Dainora
    Petraskevicius, Vladislavas
    [J]. ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2023, 16 (04) : 309 - 320
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Ranking: Next Generation of Multi-Criteria Recommendation Framework
    Zheng, Yong
    Wang, David
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 90715 - 90725
  • [3] A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components
    Almoghathawi, Yasser
    Barker, Kash
    Rocco, Claudio M.
    Nicholson, Charles D.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 158 : 142 - 151
  • [4] Multi-Criteria Ranking by Using Relaxed Pareto Ranking Methods
    Zheng, Yong
    Wang, David Xuejun
    [J]. 2023 ADJUNCT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM CONFERENCE ON USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, UMAP 2023, 2023, : 81 - 85
  • [5] Multi-criteria analysis applied to ranking rehabilitation strategies of water distribution networks
    Brentan, Bruno
    Carpitella, Silvia
    Zanfei, Ariele
    Gabriel Souza, Rui
    Menapace, Andrea
    Meirelles, Gustavo
    Righetti, Maurizio
    Izquierdo, Joaquin
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023,
  • [6] Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Zakarevicius, Algimantas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2006, 17 (04) : 601 - 618
  • [7] A strategy of multi-criteria decision-making task ranking in social-networks
    Shi, Zhiyuan
    Hao, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2013, 66 (01): : 556 - 571
  • [8] A strategy of multi-criteria decision-making task ranking in social-networks
    Zhiyuan Shi
    Fei Hao
    [J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2013, 66 : 556 - 571
  • [9] Path problem in multi-criteria ranking and generalization of AHP
    Liu, Kai-Di
    Pang, Yan-Jun
    Zhou, Shao-Ling
    Ma, Li-Tao
    Li, Wen-Guo
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (04): : 973 - 983
  • [10] A Multi-Criteria Experimental Ranking of Distributed SPARQL Evaluators
    Graux, Damien
    Jachiet, Louis
    Geneves, Pierre
    Layaida, Nabil
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 693 - 702