Cropping and Fruit Quality of Plum (Prunus domestica) Varieties on Different Rootstocks in a Young Orchard

被引:0
|
作者
Anikó Kajtár-Czinege
Éva Osztényiné Krauczi
Károly Hrotkó
机构
[1] University of John von Neumann,Faculty of Horticulture and Rural Development, Department of Horticulture
[2] University of John von Neumann,Department of Basic Sciences, GAMF Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
[3] Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences,undefined
来源
Applied Fruit Science | 2024年 / 66卷
关键词
Cumulative yield; Dry matter content (°Brix); Fruit weight; Precocity; Yield efficiency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In Hungary, plum cultivation in earlier years was mainly for processing purposes, and a suitable cultivation system and rootstock use had been developed. For this reason, the rootstock usage is rather uniform, with 95–97% of nurseries applying Myrobalan seedlings. Growing plums for the fresh market is much more profitable but it requires hand-picked trees. For small trees that can be picked standing on the ground and for high yields, we need to find rootstocks suited to the Hungarian climate. In our experiment, two types of evaluation were performed: evaluation block A with three varieties on two rootstocks and evaluation block B with two varieties on three rootstocks. The varieties were ‘Topfive’, ‘Toptaste’, ‘Čačanska lepotica’ and ‘Jojo’. The rootstocks were the traditional Myrobalan and the rootstocks worthy of testing in Hungary: St Julien GF655/2, St Julien A, and Fereley. The experiments were carried out in Kecskemét, Hungary, in a dry lowland climate. Evaluations were performed by one- and two-factor analyses of variance, and means were separated by the Duncan test. As a result, we found that in the evaluation block A trees of ‘Toptaste’ showed lower vigour and cumulative yield but higher yield efficiency. The trees on St Julien A proved to be more productive in cropping years and showed higher yield efficiency compared to Myrobalan. In evaluation block B, there was no difference in growth vigour between either varieties or rootstocks. Trees of ‘Toptaste’ showed higher cumulative yield compared to ‘Topfive’. However, the cumulative yield of trees did not show significant differences; the yield efficiency of ‘Topfive’ was highest on Fereley rootstock. Regarding fruit quality parameters, our study showed differences in fruit maturity and varietal characteristics. Considering the intensive orchard system with spindle trees, St. Julian A proved to be a more productive and precocious rootstock compared to Myrobalan seedling, while for ‘Toptaste’ variety the rootstock Fereley showed certain advantages. ‘Topfive’ proved to be unsuitable for our site conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 513
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of different rootstocks on growth, yield and fruit quality of four plum cultivars (in central of Poland)
    Grzyb, ZS
    Sitarek, M
    Kozinski, B
    VI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLUM AND PRUNE GENETICS, BREEDING AND POMOLOGY, 1998, (478): : 239 - 242
  • [32] Fungal pathogens causing fruit decay on plum (Prunus domestica L.) in Norway
    Borve, J.
    Vangdal, E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLUM AND PRUNE GENETICS, BREEDING AND POMOLOGY, 2007, (734): : 367 - 369
  • [33] How does sharka affect the phenolics of plum fruit (Prunus domestica L.)?
    Usenik, Valentina
    Stampar, Franci
    Kastelec, Damijana
    Marn, Mojca Virscek
    HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2017, 44 (02) : 64 - 72
  • [34] Mass modelling of plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit with some physical characteristics
    Shahbazi, F.
    Rahmati, S.
    QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2014, 6 (02) : 215 - 219
  • [35] INITIAL AND FINAL FRUIT SET IN SOME PLUM (Prunus domestica L.) HYBRIDS UNDER DIFFERENT POLLINATION TYPES
    Glisic, Ivana
    Cerovic, Radosav
    Milosevic, Nebojsa
    Dordevic, Milena
    Radicevic, Sanja
    GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2012, 44 (03): : 583 - 593
  • [36] The effect of storage conditions and date of picking on storability and quality of some plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit cultivars
    Plich, H
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EFFECT OF PREHARVEST AND POSTHARVEST FACTORS ON STORAGE OF FRUIT, 1999, (485): : 301 - 307
  • [37] Dietary fiber and cell wall polysaccharides from plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit, juice and pomace: Comparison of composition and functional properties for three plum varieties
    Kosmala, Monika
    Milala, Joanna
    Kolodziejczyk, Krzysztof
    Markowski, Jaroslaw
    Zbrzezniak, Monika
    Renard, Catherine M. G. C.
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 54 (02) : 1787 - 1794
  • [38] Evaluation of Local Plum Varieties (Prunus domestica L.) from the Romanian National Collection
    Butac, M.
    Budan, S.
    XII EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM ON FRUIT BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2009, 814 : 91 - 94
  • [39] Prediction of fruit quality of plums (Prunus domestica L.)
    Vangdal, E
    Meland, M
    Mage, F
    Doving, A
    Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Applications of Modelling as an Innovative Technology in the Agri-Food Chain, 2005, (674): : 613 - 617
  • [40] Study of the influence of rootstocks on fruit flesh quality of three plum cultivars
    Tabakov, S. G.
    Yordanov, A. I.
    Denev, P. N.
    Teneva, D. G.
    XII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLUM AND PRUNE GENETICS, BREEDING AND POMOLOGY, 2021, 1322 : 155 - 162