Light intensity affects the growth and flavonol biosynthesis of Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.)

被引:0
|
作者
You Xu
Guibin Wang
Fuliang Cao
Cancan Zhu
Guangyu Wang
Yousry A. El-Kassaby
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry University,College of Forest Resources and Environment
[2] Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Botany
[3] University of British Columbia,Faculty of Forestry
来源
New Forests | 2014年 / 45卷
关键词
Light intensity; Biomass production; Secondary metabolites; Gene expression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Response of growth and secondary metabolites to light intensity are useful measurements to determine suitable silviculture treatments for the cultivation of medicinal plants. Here, we analyzed the growth, flavonols (total flavonol, quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin) content, flavonols yield per plant, and expression of flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes in 2-year Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) seedlings at four different light intensities (100, 76, 40, and 25 % of full sunlight) in a greenhouse setting. Across all light intensities, the 76 % sunlight treatment produced the highest growth of total biomass, root, stem, and leaf, indicating negative effects of either fulllight or heavy shading on Ginkgo seedling development. Both flavonols (total flavonol, quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin) content and expression of flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes [PAL (Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase), CHS (Chalcone synthase), F3H (Flavanone 3-hydroxylase), and FLS (Flavonol synthase)] in leaves were highest under 100 % sunlight, suggesting that full sunlight promotes the expression of flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes and increases flavonoid biosynthesis. The highest and lowest flavonol contents were found in leaves and stems, respectively. The 76 % sunlight treatment produced the highest flavonols yield while the 100 % sunlight produced the highest flavonoids content in leaves, indicating that flavonol production per unit land area depends not only flavonol content but also biomass. Overall, in order to achieve the highest flavonols yield per area in Ginkgo leaf-harvesting plantations, it is important to manipulate light conditions of field.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 776
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of the Rooting of Micropropagated Ginkgo biloba L. Plants
    Nacheva, Lilyana
    Ivanova, Valeria
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2018, 54 : S76 - S77
  • [42] Female Plant Types of Ginkgo biloba L. in China
    Chen Peng He Fengren Tao Jun Qian Bolin Wei Jun Ling Yuping Wang Li Department of Horticulture
    Forestry Studies in China, 2003, (02) : 17 - 22
  • [43] Chemistry and biology of alkylphenols from Ginkgo biloba L.
    Jaggy, H
    Koch, E
    PHARMAZIE, 1997, 52 (10): : 735 - 738
  • [44] The effect of growth-promoting methylobacteria on seedling development in Ginkgo biloba L.
    Hellmuth, J.
    Kutschera, U.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BOTANY AND FOOD QUALITY, 2008, 82 (01): : 26 - 29
  • [45] The mechanism of pollination drop withdrawal in Ginkgo biloba L.
    Jin, Biao
    Zhang, Lei
    Lu, Yan
    Wang, Di
    Jiang, Xiao X.
    Zhang, Min
    Wang, Li
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [46] Antibacterial Activities of Ginkgo biloba L. Leaf Extracts
    Sati, S. C.
    Joshi, Savita
    THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2011, 11 : 2237 - 2242
  • [47] Annual growth and wood characteristics of Ginkgo biloba L. in Egypt: A pilot study
    Heneidy, Selim Z.
    Farahat, Emad A.
    Mohareb, Ahmed S. O.
    Toto, Soliman M.
    Hassan, Khaled T. S.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 64 (03):
  • [48] Integrated evaluation of soil fertility in Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China
    Wang, Guibin
    Cao, Fuliang
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2011, 83 (01) : 89 - 100
  • [49] Integrated evaluation of soil fertility in Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China
    Guibin Wang
    Fuliang Cao
    Agroforestry Systems, 2011, 83
  • [50] COMPLEX FLAVONOL GLYCOSIDES FROM THE LEAVES OF GINKGO-BILOBA
    HASLER, A
    GROSS, GA
    MEIER, B
    STICHER, O
    PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 31 (04) : 1391 - 1394