Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory

被引:0
|
作者
Marilyn Cyr
Derek E. Nee
Eric Nelson
Thea Senger
John Jonides
Chara Malapani
机构
[1] New York State Psychiatric Institute,Division of Cognitive Neuroscience
[2] Florida State University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Michigan,Department of Psychology
[4] Columbia University,Department of Psychiatry
来源
Cognitive Processing | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
Interference/inhibition in memory retrieval; Working memory; Directed forgetting; Object recognition; Recollection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Working memory (WM) is a cognitive system responsible for actively maintaining and processing relevant information and is central to successful cognition. A process critical to WM is the resolution of proactive interference (PI), which involves suppressing memory intrusions from prior memories that are no longer relevant. Most studies that have examined resistance to PI in a process-pure fashion used verbal material. By contrast, studies using non-verbal material are scarce, and it remains unclear whether the effect of PI is domain-general or whether it applies solely to the verbal domain. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of PI in visual WM using both objects with high and low nameability. Using a Directed-Forgetting paradigm, we varied discriminability between WM items on two dimensions, one verbal (high-nameability vs. low-nameability objects) and one perceptual (colored vs. gray objects). As in previous studies using verbal material, effects of PI were found with object stimuli, even after controlling for verbal labels being used (i.e., low-nameability condition). We also found that the addition of distinctive features (color, verbal label) increased performance in rejecting intrusion probes, most likely through an increase in discriminability between content–context bindings in WM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory
    Jonides, J
    Nee, DE
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 139 (01) : 181 - 193
  • [32] The Locus of Proactive Interference in Visual Working Memory
    Shoval, Roy
    Makovski, Tal
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2021, 47 (05) : 704 - 715
  • [33] Disentangling the effects of working memory, language, parental education, and non-verbal intelligence on children's mathematical abilities
    Pina, Violeta
    Fuentes, Luis J.
    Castillo, Alejandro
    Diamantopoulou, Sofia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [34] Delay modulates spectral correlates in the human EEG of non-verbal auditory working memory
    Peterson, DA
    Thaut, MH
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2002, 328 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [35] Recognition memory for non-verbal material in schizophrenia
    Tyson, PJ
    Roberts, KH
    Mortimer, A
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2002, 53 (03) : 132 - 132
  • [36] Non-verbal memory in experienced actors and controls
    Notthoff, Nanna
    Jonides, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 800 - 800
  • [37] Non-verbal Signals in HRI: Interference in Human Perception
    Johal, Wafa
    Calvary, Gaelle
    Pesty, Sylvie
    SOCIAL ROBOTICS (ICSR 2015), 2015, 9388 : 275 - 284
  • [38] Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task
    Postle, Bradley R.
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    Goldstein, Jeremy H.
    Curtis, Clayton E.
    D'Esposito, Mark
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 1 (01) : 10 - 21
  • [39] Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task
    Bradley R. Postle
    Jeffrey S. Berger
    Jeremy H. Goldstein
    Clayton E. Curtis
    Mark D’Esposito
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2001, 1 : 10 - 21
  • [40] Effects of verbal and nonverbal interference on spatial and object visual working memory
    Postle, BR
    D'Esposito, M
    Corkin, S
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2005, 33 (02) : 203 - 212