Mechanisms for individual, group-based and crowd-based attention to social information

被引:0
|
作者
Jelena Ristic
Francesca Capozzi
机构
[1] McGill University,Department of Psychology
[2] Université du Québec à Montréal,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two or more interacting individuals make up a social group. In this Review, we show that human attention plays a key part in the selection, management and maintenance of social interactions between individual members of social groups of any size. Three attentional mechanisms are presented here. The individual cue-selection mechanism facilitates the selection of social cues, such as gaze, facial or head information, from individual group members. The group-based selection mechanism enables selection based on the perceived quality of social cues derived from individual group members or the emerging interactions between individual group members. Finally, the crowd-based selection mechanism enables selection based on an overall representation of the social information derived from assessing the majority of consistent cues in the crowd. The three attentional mechanisms are used flexibly, interchangeably and dynamically as a function of group size and the ability to individuate group members.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 732
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-Utility: Conciliating Individual Freedom and Common Good in the Crowd-based Business Model
    Turi, Abeba Nigussie
    Domingo-Ferrer, Josep
    Sanchez, David
    Osmani, Dritan
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING (ICEBE), 2015, : 62 - 67
  • [42] EMPOWERING GROUP-BASED LEARNING WITH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    Sirkemaa, S.
    Varpelaide, H.
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 3780 - 3784
  • [43] Crowd E-Home—A Crowd-Based Collaborative Decoration Platform
    Ge, Rui
    Sun, Hongbo
    [J]. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2022, 6 (03) : 135 - 141
  • [44] Nurses' experience of individual, group-based, and professional autonomy
    Both-Nwabuwe, Jitske M. C.
    Lips-Wiersma, Marjolein
    Dijkstra, Maria T. M.
    Beersma, Bianca
    [J]. NURSING OUTLOOK, 2019, 67 (06) : 734 - 746
  • [45] Crowd-based Best-effort Number Estimation
    Furuhashi, Yuzuki
    Matsubara, Masaki
    Morishima, Atsuyuki
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2017, : 4375 - 4377
  • [46] A Crowd-Based Process and Tool for HTS Hit Triage
    Peng, Zhengwei
    Gillespie, Paul
    Weisel, Martin
    So, Sung-Sau
    So, W. Venus
    Kondru, Rama
    Narayanan, Arjun
    Hermann, Johannes C.
    [J]. MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2013, 32 (04) : 337 - 345
  • [47] CDB: Optimizing Queries with Crowd-Based Selections and Joins
    Li, Guoliang
    Chai, Chengliang
    Fan, Ju
    Weng, Xueping
    Li, Jian
    Zheng, Yudian
    Li, Yuanbing
    Yu, Xiang
    Zhang, Xiaohang
    Yuan, Haitao
    [J]. SIGMOD'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA, 2017, : 1463 - 1478
  • [48] A Gradual Approach to Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering: The Case of Conference Online Social Networks
    Levy, Meira
    Hadar, Irit
    Te'eni, Dov
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CROWD-BASED REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING (CROWDRE 2015), 2015, : 25 - 30
  • [49] Crowd-based ontology engineering with the uComp Protege plugin
    Wohlgenannt, Gerhard
    Sabou, Marta
    Hanika, Florian
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB, 2016, 7 (04) : 379 - 398
  • [50] Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast
    Benjamin List
    [J]. Nature, 2017, 546 : 9 - 9