Niche Construction Theory and Human Architecture

被引:57
|
作者
Odling-Smee J. [1 ]
Turner J.S. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford
[2] Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry, Syracuse, NY
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Architecture; Biomimicry; Culture; Niche construction; Termites;
D O I
10.1007/s13752-012-0029-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In modern evolutionary theory, selection acts on particular genes and assemblages of genes that operate through phenotypes expressed in environments. This view, however, overlooks the fact that organisms often alter their environments in pursuit of fitness needs and thus modify some environmental selection pressures. Niche construction theory introduces a reciprocal causal process that modifies natural selection relative to three general kinds of environmental components: abiota, biota (other organisms), and artifacts. The ways in which niche-constructing organisms can construct or modify the components differ. Modification of abiota, for example, may have different consequences from the construction of artifacts. Some changes in abiota may simply be caused by the by-products of metabolisms and activities of organisms. Alternatively, artifacts may be “extended phenotypes” that demonstrate obvious prior “design” and “construction” by organisms in the service of fitness needs. Nevertheless, adaptation should always account for the reciprocity between constructed niches and the living agents that construct them. Looking to well-adapted nature for inspiration for human-built artifacts must account for this reciprocity between phenotype and constructed environment as well as the novel features of human architecture, including frank intentionality of design and novel culturally acquired knowledge. © 2012, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognitive Research.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal foraging theory and niche-construction theory do not stand in opposition
    Mohlenhoff, Kathryn A.
    Coltrain, Joan Brenner
    Codding, Brian F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (24) : E3093 - E3093
  • [42] Homeostasis and the physiological dimension of niche construction theory in ecology and evolution
    Turner, J. Scott
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (02) : 203 - 219
  • [43] Host manipulation by parasites through the lens of Niche Construction Theory
    Forti, Lucas Rodriguez
    Szabo, Judit K.
    Japyassu, Hilton F.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2023, 210
  • [44] Comparative Study of Jiangsu Construction Enterprises Based on Niche Theory
    Yang Huan
    Li Qiming
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 640 - 645
  • [45] Validating niche-construction theory through path analysis
    William A. Brock
    Michael J. O’Brien
    R. Alexander Bentley
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2016, 8 : 819 - 837
  • [46] Rock art and niche construction: a theory, case study and hypothesis
    Acevedo, Agustin
    ESTUDIOS ATACAMENOS, 2025, (71):
  • [47] Validating niche-construction theory through path analysis
    Brock, William A.
    O'Brien, Michael J.
    Bentley, R. Alexander
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 8 (04) : 819 - 837
  • [48] Homeostasis and the physiological dimension of niche construction theory in ecology and evolution
    J. Scott Turner
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2016, 30 : 203 - 219
  • [49] Study on Construction of Engineering Management Specialty Based on Niche Theory
    Chen Yuchao
    Zheng Wenyu
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, 2009, : 727 - 731
  • [50] Human nature and cognitive-developmental niche construction
    Stotz, Karola
    PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 9 (04) : 483 - 501