Ulipristal Acetate: Critical Review About Endometrial and Ovulatory Effects in Emergency Contraception

被引:0
|
作者
Bruno Mozzanega
Salvatore Gizzo
Stefania Di Gangi
Erich Cosmi
Giovanni Battista Nardelli
机构
[1] University of Padua,Department of Woman and Child Health
[2] U.O.C. di Ginecologia e Ostetricia,Dipartimento di Salute della Donna e del Bambino
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2014年 / 21卷
关键词
ulipristal acetate; emergency contraception; ovulation delay; endometrial effects; unexpected pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of emergency contraception (EC) is usually estimated by comparing the number of observed pregnancies to that of expected pregnancies after unprotected intercourse. Second-generation selective progesterone receptors modulators have been developed and evaluated for EC use. Among these compounds, ulipristal acetate (UPA) has been proven to share the same antiprogestin activity as mifepristone, and as with mifepristone, UPA has been demonstrated to be effective up to 120 hours after unprotected intercourse. The UPA is more effective than levonorgestrel (LNG) in preventing the appearance of clinically evident pregnancies. The LNG delays ovulation only when taken at the beginning of the fertile period; taken later, it is ineffective on ovulation, while it has been proven to impair the subsequent luteal function. The effectiveness of LNG decreases as time elapses and is limited to 72 hours after unprotected intercourse. The UPA maintains consistent effectiveness for 5 days after unprotected intercourse, and this effectiveness is independent on which of these 5 days it is taken. The ability of UPA to delay ovulation decreases progressively as ovulation approaches and is null at the time of the luteinizing hormone (LH) peak: 1 to 2 days before ovulation, UPA behaves as a placebo. The persistent effectiveness of the drug cannot be due to antiovulatory action, as it decreases sharply as LH approaches its peak level. The effectiveness is most likely due to the dramatic endometrial effects of the drug that are produced regardless of when it is taken. These effects are consistently present, as the threshold for altering endometrial morphology is lower than the threshold for altering folliculogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 685
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double dosing ulipristal acetate emergency contraception for individuals with obesity: a randomised crossover trial
    Edelman, Alison
    Hennebold, Jon D.
    Bond, Kise
    Lim, Jeong Y.
    Cherala, Ganesh
    Blue, Steven W.
    Kraft, Shawn P.
    Erikson, David W.
    Archer, David
    Jensen, Jeffery
    [J]. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024,
  • [32] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION WITH ULIPRISTAL ACETATE VERSUS LEVONORGESTREL FOR MINORS IN FRANCE
    Schmid, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A510 - A510
  • [33] The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France
    Schmid, Ramona
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [34] Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate emergency contraception in women with normal and obese body mass index
    Praditpan, Piyapa
    Hamouie, Angie
    Basaraba, Cale N.
    Nandakumar, Renu
    Cremers, Serge
    Davis, Anne R.
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (05) : 464 - 469
  • [35] ULIPRISTAL ACETATE (UPA) IS AFFORDABLE AS EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION (EC) IF USED WHERE LEVONORGESTREL (LNG) IS UNLICENSED
    Jones, A. B.
    Garcia, L. Dominguez
    Cohen, C. E.
    Nwokolo, N.
    Day, S. L.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2012, 88 : A39 - A39
  • [36] Effect of ulipristal acetate and mifepristone at emergency contraception dose on the embryo-endometrial attachment using an in vitro human trophoblastic spheroid and endometrial cell co-culture model
    Li, Hang-Wun Raymond
    Li, Ying-Xing
    Li, Tian-Tian
    Fan, Hongjie
    Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu
    Yeung, William Shu-Biu
    Ho, Pak-Chung
    Lee, Kai-Fai
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (12) : 2414 - 2422
  • [37] Menstruation behavior after use of emergency contraception: Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel in women of reproductive age
    Stanoulov, G.
    Bourazan, Chalil A.
    Tsikouras, P.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : E233 - E234
  • [38] Ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception: postmarketing experience after use by more than 1 million women
    Levy, Delphine P.
    Jager, Martine
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Abitbol, Jean-Louis
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (05) : 431 - 433
  • [39] Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study
    Envall, Niklas
    Kofoed, Nina Groes
    Kopp-Kallner, Helena
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (08) : 887 - 893
  • [40] Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis
    Glasier, Anna F.
    Cameron, Sharon T.
    Fine, Paul M.
    Logan, Susan J. S.
    Casale, William
    Van Horn, Jennifer
    Sogor, Laszlo
    Blithe, Diana L.
    Scherrer, Bruno
    Mathe, Henri
    Jaspart, Amelie
    Ulmann, Andre
    Gainer, Erin
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9714): : 555 - 562