Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients

被引:0
|
作者
P Quittet
P Ceballos
E Lopez
Z Y Lu
P Latry
C Becht
E Legouffe
N Fegueux
C Exbrayat
D Pouessel
V Rouillé
J P Daures
B Klein
J F Rossi
机构
[1] Service Hématologie et Oncologie médicale,
[2] Hopital Lapeyronie,undefined
[3] Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire,undefined
[4] Hopital St-Eloi,undefined
[5] Unité de Biostatistiques,undefined
[6] IURC,undefined
[7] INSERM U475,undefined
来源
关键词
G-CSF; GM-CSF; hematopoietic stem cells;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of a combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF versus G-CSF alone, after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) was compared in two randomized phase III studies, including 120 patients. In study A, 60 patients received 5 × 2 μg/kg/day of G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to 5 μg/kg/day of G-CSF. In study B, 60 patients received 2.5 × 2 μg/kg/day G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to G-CSF alone (5 μg/kg/day). With the aim to collect at least 5 × 106/kg CD34 cells in a maximum of three large volume leukapherises (LK), 123 LK were performed in study A, showing a significantly higher number of patients reaching 10 × 106/kg CD34 cells (21/29 in G+GM-CSF arm vs 11/27 in G-CSF arm, P=0.00006). In study B, 109 LK were performed, with similar results (10/27 vs 15/26, P=0.003). In both the study, the total harvest of CD34 cells/kg was twofold higher in G-CSF plus GM-CSF group (18.3 × 106 in study A and 15.85 × 106 in study B) than in G-CSF group (9 × 106 in study A and 8.1 × 106 in study B), a significant difference only seen in multiple myeloma, with no significant difference in terms of mobilized myeloma cells between G-CSF and GM-CSF groups.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF
    Perillo, A
    Pierelli, L
    Scambia, G
    Serafini, R
    Paladini, U
    Salerno, MG
    Bonanno, G
    Fattorossi, A
    Leone, G
    Mancuso, S
    Menichella, G
    TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (05) : 674 - 680
  • [22] Changes in immunological recovery in patients who received post-transplant G-CSF or GM-CSF after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT)
    Arpaci, F
    Dogru, T
    Ozturk, B
    Komurcu, S
    Ozet, A
    Yilmaz, MI
    Beyzadeoglu, M
    Turan, A
    Sengul, A
    Yalcin, A
    HAEMATOLOGIA, 2002, 32 (03) : 253 - 264
  • [23] Mobilization and collection of Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells (PBPC) after cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (Gm-CSF) plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)
    Arroyo, JL
    Hernández, R
    Del Cañizo, MC
    Corral, M
    González-Fraile, MI
    López, C
    Caballero, MD
    Nieto, MJ
    Vázquez, L
    Perez-Simón, JA
    San Miguel, JF
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 27 : S344 - S344
  • [24] Randomized phase II study of FLT3 ligand (Mobist™) in combination with GM-CSF or G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma or ovarian cancer.
    Stiff, PJ
    Beveridge, RA
    Vose, J
    Fay, J
    Schuster, MW
    Geller, RB
    Caron, D
    Lebsack, ME
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 666A - 666A
  • [25] THE EFFECTS OF VARIATION OF THE DOSE AND SCHEDULE OF G-CSF ADMINISTRATION AFTER LOW-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE (1.5 G/M(2) ON BOTH NEUTROPHIL AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR-CELL LEVELS
    JONES, HM
    JONES, SA
    WATTS, MJ
    MILLS, W
    KHWAJA, A
    GOLDSTONE, AH
    LINCH, DC
    BLOOD, 1993, 82 (10) : A233 - A233
  • [26] Randomized comparison of two G-CSF schedules for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in high-risk breast cancer patients.
    Roy, V
    Mandanas, RA
    Carter, TH
    Selby, GB
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 326A - 326A
  • [27] Intermediate VP-16 (1gr/m2) plus G-CSF (10mcg/kg) or cyclophosphamide (3gr/m2) plus G-CSF (10mcg/kg) for progenitor cell mobilisation in lymphoma patients
    Pivkova, A.
    Stavrik, S. Genadieva
    Stojanoski, Z.
    Cevreska, L.
    Karanfilski, O.
    Milenkov, V.
    Georgievski, B.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 43 : S212 - S212
  • [28] A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer
    Schwartzberg, LS
    Weaver, CH
    Birch, R
    Manner, C
    Tauer, K
    Beeker, T
    Morgan-Ihrig, C
    MacAneny, B
    Leff, R
    Smith, R
    Hainsworth, J
    Greco, T
    Schwerkoske, J
    Murphy, MN
    Buckner, CD
    JOURNAL OF HEMATOTHERAPY, 1998, 7 (02): : 141 - 150
  • [29] A COMPARISON OF PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELL MOBILIZATION AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AS A SINGLE AGENT IN DOSES OF 4 G/M2 OR 7 G/M2 IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER
    ROWLINGS, PA
    RAWLING, CM
    TO, LB
    BAYLY, JL
    JUTTNER, CA
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 22 (06): : 660 - 664
  • [30] Efficient peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with low-dose G-CSF (50 mu g/m(2)) after salvage chemotherapy for lymphoma
    Martinez, C
    Sureda, A
    Martino, R
    Cancelas, JA
    Madoz, P
    Garcia, J
    Brunet, S
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (10) : 855 - 858