Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients

被引:0
|
作者
P Quittet
P Ceballos
E Lopez
Z Y Lu
P Latry
C Becht
E Legouffe
N Fegueux
C Exbrayat
D Pouessel
V Rouillé
J P Daures
B Klein
J F Rossi
机构
[1] Service Hématologie et Oncologie médicale,
[2] Hopital Lapeyronie,undefined
[3] Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire,undefined
[4] Hopital St-Eloi,undefined
[5] Unité de Biostatistiques,undefined
[6] IURC,undefined
[7] INSERM U475,undefined
来源
关键词
G-CSF; GM-CSF; hematopoietic stem cells;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of a combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF versus G-CSF alone, after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) was compared in two randomized phase III studies, including 120 patients. In study A, 60 patients received 5 × 2 μg/kg/day of G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to 5 μg/kg/day of G-CSF. In study B, 60 patients received 2.5 × 2 μg/kg/day G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to G-CSF alone (5 μg/kg/day). With the aim to collect at least 5 × 106/kg CD34 cells in a maximum of three large volume leukapherises (LK), 123 LK were performed in study A, showing a significantly higher number of patients reaching 10 × 106/kg CD34 cells (21/29 in G+GM-CSF arm vs 11/27 in G-CSF arm, P=0.00006). In study B, 109 LK were performed, with similar results (10/27 vs 15/26, P=0.003). In both the study, the total harvest of CD34 cells/kg was twofold higher in G-CSF plus GM-CSF group (18.3 × 106 in study A and 15.85 × 106 in study B) than in G-CSF group (9 × 106 in study A and 8.1 × 106 in study B), a significant difference only seen in multiple myeloma, with no significant difference in terms of mobilized myeloma cells between G-CSF and GM-CSF groups.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest:: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients
    Quittet, P.
    Ceballos, P.
    Lopez, E.
    Lu, Z. Y.
    Latry, P.
    Becht, C.
    Legouffe, E.
    Fegueux, N.
    Exbrayat, C.
    Pouessel, D.
    Rouille, V.
    Daures, J. P.
    Klein, B.
    Rossi, J. F.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 38 (04) : 275 - 284
  • [2] Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: A randomized prospective study
    Gazitt, Y
    Callander, N
    Freytes, CO
    Shaughnessy, P
    Liu, Q
    Tsai, TW
    Devore, P
    JOURNAL OF HEMATOTHERAPY & STEM CELL RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (05): : 737 - 748
  • [3] Randomized trial of sequential administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF vs. G-CSF alone following peripheral blood progenitor cell autograft in solid tumors
    Recchia, F
    Accorsi, P
    Bonfini, T
    De Filippis, S
    Grimaldi, M
    Corrao, G
    Rosselli, M
    Amiconi, G
    Iacone, A
    Rea, S
    JOURNAL OF INTERFERON AND CYTOKINE RESEARCH, 2000, 20 (02): : 171 - 177
  • [4] Randomized mobilization of CD34+ peripheral stem cells by G-CSF compared to G+GM-CSF (half dose) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2)
    Quittet, P
    Legouffe, E
    Lopez, E
    Fegueux, N
    Klein, B
    Rossi, JF
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 272A - 272A
  • [5] Results of a BNLI randomized trial of G-CSF dose after cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 for progenitor cell mobilization.
    Ings, SJ
    Schey, S
    Hancock, B
    Watts, MJ
    Vandenberghe, E
    Goldstone, AH
    Elston, T
    Pettengell, R
    Long, S
    Smith, P
    Linch, DC
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 666A - 666A
  • [6] A randomized prospective study of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CTX) in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF followed by G-CSF, in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients.
    Gazitt, Y
    Callander, N
    Freytes, CO
    Shaughnessy, P
    Tsai, TW
    Alsina, M
    Anderson, JE
    Devore, P
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 338B - 338B
  • [7] Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: High-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    Alegre, A
    Tomas, JF
    MartinezChamorro, C
    GilFernandez, JJ
    FernandezVillalta, MJ
    Arranz, R
    Diaz, MA
    Granda, A
    Bernardo, MR
    Escudero, A
    LopezLorenzo, JL
    FernandezRanada, JM
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [8] Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    A Alegre
    JF Tomás
    C Martínez-Chamorro
    JJ Gil-Fernández
    MJ Fernández-Villalta
    R Arranz
    MA Díaz
    A Granda
    MR Bernardo
    A Escudero
    JL López-Lorenzo
    JM Fernández-Rañada
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1997, 20 : 211 - 217
  • [9] Hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in breast cancer
    Charrier, S
    Chollet, P
    Bay, JO
    Curé, H
    Kwiatkowski, F
    Portefaix, G
    Communal, Y
    Bétail, G
    Plagne, R
    Chassagne, J
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 25 (07) : 705 - 710
  • [10] Hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in breast cancer
    S Charrier
    P Chollet
    J-O Bay
    H Curé
    F Kwiatkowski
    G Portefaix
    Y Communal
    G Bétail
    R Plagne
    J Chassagne
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2000, 25 : 705 - 710