Leveraged enforcement under the EPA’s High Priority Violation Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Lirong Liu
Zhou Yang
机构
[1] Texas A&M University-Commerce,Department of Economics and Finance
[2] Robert Morris University,Department of Social Sciences
来源
Empirical Economics | 2020年 / 58卷
关键词
Air pollution regulation; Leveraged enforcement; Targeted enforcement; High Priority Violation Policy; Firm compliance; Clean Air Act; D62; Q53; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the environmental enforcement literature, leveraged enforcement is an important theoretical model in which firms with current violations are targeted with intensive inspections and sanctions in the future. This paper examines the effects of leveraged enforcement on facility compliance and the differential deterrence effects of enforcement. We focus on the Environmental Protection Agency’s High Priority Violation (HPV) Policy, which represents leveraged enforcement in the regulations of air pollution in the USA. We estimate dynamic panel data models using 8755 major manufacturing facilities in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Our results suggest that being classified as an HPV facility can have significant and positive effects on compliance. We also find general deterrence effects such that a given facility’s compliance rate rises with fines on HPV facilities within the same state. However, the deterrence effects of enforcement differ by HPV status. HPV facilities on average are less responsive to additional enforcement on itself and other facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1304
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on the policy effect of central Bank's giving priority to green bonds under the collateral framework
    Chen, Ruoyu
    Zhu, Jingzhi
    Wang, Xingyu
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 78
  • [42] Alberta's Priority Rural Policy Research Questions
    Hallstrom, Lars
    Finseth, Naomi
    Macklin, Patricia
    Parkins, John
    Mundel, Karsten
    Watson, Paul
    Rudd, Murray A.
    Baugh, David
    Gervais, Joel
    Keay, Devin
    JOURNAL OF RURAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 9 (04): : 144 - U317
  • [43] EPA's Title V Source Policy Takes a Hit
    Neville, Angela
    POWER, 2012, 156 (11) : 28 - 28
  • [44] The Third Epoch: A Pracademic View of the EPA's Office of Policy
    La Porte, Todd M.
    Opp, Susan M.
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2016, 49 (04) : 923 - 926
  • [45] The EPA will move forward under Leavitt's leadership
    不详
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2003, 99 (12) : 17 - 17
  • [46] EPA's homeland security agenda under scrutiny
    Petkewich, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (01) : 13A - 13A
  • [47] Between-center variation in high-priority listing status under the new heart allocation policy
    Ran, Gege
    Chung, Kevin
    Anderson, Allen S.
    Gibbons, Robert D.
    Narang, Nikhil
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    Parker, William F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (11) : 3684 - 3693
  • [48] Dynamic enforcement of the strict integrity policy in Biba's model
    Zhang, Xiangfeng
    Sun, Yufang
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2005, 42 (05): : 746 - 754
  • [49] QED limits for many-server systems under a priority policy
    Petar Momčilović
    Amir Motaei
    Queueing Systems, 2018, 90 : 125 - 159
  • [50] QED limits for many-server systems under a priority policy
    Momcilovic, Petar
    Motaei, Amir
    QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2018, 90 (1-2) : 125 - 159