The Role of Journalism in Dialogic Innovation Processes—the Case of the Helsinki Deaconess Institute Multi-stakeholder Workshops

被引:0
|
作者
Taneli Heikka
Elias G. Carayannis
机构
[1] University of Jyväskylä,
[2] George Washington University,undefined
来源
关键词
Journalism; Participatory journalism; Innovation; Dialogue; Quadruple helix; Theory U;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Journalists are increasingly invited to engage in dialogic innovation processes not only to report on innovations but also take part in identifying social problems and co-creating possible solutions. We analyze a series of multi-stakeholder innovation workshops at the health care social enterprise group Helsinki Deaconess Institute in Finland from 2012 to 2014 and the mediated results of the workshops. Journalists were part of all three stages in the innovation process: the creation of a holding space for innovation, creating concrete innovations, and communicating the outcomes at the level of mass communication. We suggest the model of participatory solutions journalism that could, in part, help open the gridlock journalism faces with corroding legitimacy from the outside and resistance to innovation from the inside. Our study builds on previous research suggesting that journalism should be seen as the “fourth strand” of the innovation ecosystem elements alongside the industry, the academia, and the government (Carayannis and Campell 2012; Bast et al. 2015). We add to this literature the finding that such a co-creating role can be supported by dialogic organizational development methods (Scharmer and Kaufer 2013; Bohm et al. 1991; Bohm 1996; Senge 1990). The pitfall of participatory solutions journalism includes the possible corrosion of journalistic impartiality.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1441
页数:26
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] The Role of Journalism in Dialogic Innovation Processes-the Case of the Helsinki Deaconess Institute Multi-stakeholder Workshops
    Heikka, Taneli
    Carayannis, Elias G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2018, 9 (04) : 1415 - 1441
  • [2] Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa
    J. Michael Denney
    Paul Michael Case
    Alexander Metzger
    Maria Ivanova
    Araya Asfaw
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2018, 13 : 879 - 893
  • [3] Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa
    Denney, J. Michael
    Case, Paul Michael
    Metzger, Alexander
    Ivanova, Maria
    Asfaw, Araya
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (03) : 879 - 893
  • [4] Actor social networks as knowledge sharing mechanisms in multi-stakeholder processes: a case of coffee innovation platforms of Uganda
    Magala, Damalie Babirye
    Mangheni, Margaret Najjingo
    Miiro, Richard Fred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2019, 25 (04): : 323 - 336
  • [5] Sustainable business model innovation: The role of boundary work for multi-stakeholder alignment
    Velter, M. G. E.
    Bitzer, V.
    Bocken, N. M. P.
    Kemp, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [6] Constraints and opportunities in using multi-stakeholder processes to implement integrated agricultural systems research The Humidtropics case
    Hiwasaki, Lisa
    Idrissou, Latifou
    Okafor, Chris
    van der Hoek, Rein
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION IN SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE: AN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS RESEARCH APPROACH, 2017, : 350 - 366
  • [7] Meta-Organizations in the Making.A Multiple Case Study of Multi-Stakeholder Meta-Organizations for Social Innovation
    Saniossian, Jennifer
    Lecocq, Xavier
    Beaucourt, Christel
    [J]. MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (02): : 27 - 44
  • [8] A state-initiated multi-stakeholder platform as an instrument to build agricultural innovation system capacity: a case study from Ethiopia
    Seifu, Mikinay
    van Paassen, Annemarie
    Klerkx, Laurens
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022,