Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa

被引:21
|
作者
Denney, J. Michael [1 ]
Case, Paul Michael [1 ]
Metzger, Alexander [1 ]
Ivanova, Maria [1 ]
Asfaw, Araya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Addis Ababa Univ, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Participation; International development; Power; Critical theory; Concept mapping; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CONFLICT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-018-0533-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The sustainability science literature views the participation of local stakeholders as a necessary element for both conducting transdisciplinary research and implementing sustainable development projects. However, there is very little critical reflection on how power dynamics between researchers and local stakeholders affect the success of participatory processes. This article draws on the critical tradition of political science and sociology to examine how power dynamics are inherent to, and should always be a concern during, participatory processes. This also applies for sustainability science research and the implementation of sustainable development projects, especially in developing contexts such as those of Africa. While local participation enhances the voices of local stakeholders, power dynamics between them and the researchers driving these processes can dampen local voices or elide critical pieces of information. Using evidence from participatory workshops in Djibouti and Kenya, we demonstrate that these power dynamics can unintentionally exclude critical knowledge and perspectives from the formal proceedings of participatory workshops, despite an express focus on stakeholder inclusion and participatory methods. Using Steven Lukes' tripartite conception of power, we elicit how the workshop structure and the actions of researchers as the designers and facilitators of the workshop may have prevented the emergence of this critical information. The central argument is that reflecting on power will help researchers and practitioners identify the power dynamics inherent in the participatory processes so they can work to overcome them. Such self-reflection can strengthen sustainability science and practice in African and other contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 893
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa
    J. Michael Denney
    Paul Michael Case
    Alexander Metzger
    Maria Ivanova
    Araya Asfaw
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2018, 13 : 879 - 893
  • [2] The Role of Journalism in Dialogic Innovation Processes—the Case of the Helsinki Deaconess Institute Multi-stakeholder Workshops
    Taneli Heikka
    Elias G. Carayannis
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2018, 9 : 1415 - 1441
  • [3] The Role of Journalism in Dialogic Innovation Processes-the Case of the Helsinki Deaconess Institute Multi-stakeholder Workshops
    Heikka, Taneli
    Carayannis, Elias G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2018, 9 (04) : 1415 - 1441
  • [4] Participatory multi-stakeholder assessment of alternative development scenarios in contested landscapes
    Milena Kiatkoski Kim
    Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero
    Ken Wallace
    David Pannell
    Rosemary Hill
    Vanessa M. Adams
    Michael Douglas
    Robert L. Pressey
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2022, 17 : 221 - 241
  • [5] Participatory multi-stakeholder assessment of alternative development scenarios in contested landscapes
    Kim, Milena Kiatkoski
    Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G.
    Wallace, Ken
    Pannell, David
    Hill, Rosemary
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Douglas, Michael
    Pressey, Robert L.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01) : 221 - 241
  • [6] A multi-stakeholder view on director remuneration guidance in South Africa
    van Zyl, Marilee
    Mans-Kemp, Nadia
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 36 (03) : 195 - 212
  • [7] Enhancing public health through multi-stakeholder collaboration in Africa
    Ngoma, Chimwemwe
    Phiri, William K. B.
    Chidzaye, Robert
    Lungu, Sahan
    Matatiyo, Apatsa
    Mwase, Martha Shantel
    Nyimba, Wanangwa
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 86 (10): : 5672 - 5675
  • [8] Multi-stakeholder aid to education: power in the context of partnership
    Menashy, Francine
    [J]. GLOBALISATION SOCIETIES AND EDUCATION, 2018, 16 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [9] Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: A Conceptual Basis to Analyze Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Multi-Stakeholder Transformative Governance Illustrated with an Example from South Africa
    Jansen, Louisa J. M.
    Kalas, Patrick P.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 30
  • [10] Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives
    Koen Kusters
    Louise Buck
    Maartje de Graaf
    Peter Minang
    Cora van Oosten
    Roderick Zagt
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2018, 62 : 170 - 181