Nonlinear mixed-effects models for pharmacokinetic data analysis: assessment of the random-effects distribution

被引:0
|
作者
Reza Drikvandi
机构
[1] Imperial College London,Statistics Section, Department of Mathematics
关键词
Diagnostic tool; Gradient function; Nonlinear mixed-effects models; Pharmacokinetic data; Random effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nonlinear mixed-effects models are frequently used for pharmacokinetic data analysis, and they account for inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters by incorporating subject-specific random effects into the model. The random effects are often assumed to follow a (multivariate) normal distribution. However, many articles have shown that misspecifying the random-effects distribution can introduce bias in the estimates of parameters and affect inferences about the random effects themselves, such as estimation of the inter-subject variability. Because random effects are unobservable latent variables, it is difficult to assess their distribution. In a recent paper we developed a diagnostic tool based on the so-called gradient function to assess the random-effects distribution in mixed models. There we evaluated the gradient function for generalized liner mixed models and in the presence of a single random effect. However, assessing the random-effects distribution in nonlinear mixed-effects models is more challenging, especially when multiple random effects are present, and therefore the results from linear and generalized linear mixed models may not be valid for such nonlinear models. In this paper, we further investigate the gradient function and evaluate its performance for such nonlinear mixed-effects models which are common in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We use simulations as well as real data from an intensive pharmacokinetic study to illustrate the proposed diagnostic tool.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meta-analysis Using Flexible Random-effects Distribution Models
    Noma, Hisashi
    Nagashima, Kengo
    Kato, Shogo
    Teramukai, Satoshi
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 441 - 448
  • [32] Influence diagnostics in linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models with censored data
    Matos, Larissa A.
    Lachos, Victor H.
    Balakrishnan, N.
    Labra, Filidor V.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 57 (01) : 450 - 464
  • [33] Nonlinear Random-Effects Mixture Models for Repeated Measures
    Codd, Casey L.
    Cudeck, Robert
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2014, 79 (01) : 60 - 83
  • [34] Nonlinear Random-Effects Mixture Models for Repeated Measures
    Casey L. Codd
    Robert Cudeck
    [J]. Psychometrika, 2014, 79 : 60 - 83
  • [35] Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of MNREAD data
    Cheung, Sing-Hang
    Kallie, Christopher S.
    Legge, Gordon E.
    Cheong, Allen M. Y.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2008, 49 (02) : 828 - 835
  • [36] Pathway analysis for family data using nested random-effects models
    Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat
    Hae-Won Uh
    Roula Tsonaka
    [J]. BMC Proceedings, 5 (Suppl 9)
  • [37] Gene analysis for longitudinal family data using random-effects models
    Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat
    Quinta Helmer
    Bruna Balliu
    Erik van den Akker
    Roula Tsonaka
    Hae-Won Uh
    [J]. BMC Proceedings, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [38] Application of mixed-effects models for exposure assessment
    Peretz, C.
    Goren, A.
    Smid, T.
    Kromhout, H.
    [J]. 2002, Oxford University Press (46):
  • [39] A Note on the Indeterminacy of the Random-Effects Distribution in Hierarchical Models
    Alonso, Ariel
    Litiere, Saskia
    Laenen, Annouschka
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2010, 64 (04): : 318 - 324
  • [40] Application of mixed-effects models for exposure assessment
    Peretz, C
    Goren, A
    Smid, T
    Kromhout, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2002, 46 (01): : 69 - 77