Understanding the social impacts of enforcement activities on illegal wildlife trade in China

被引:0
|
作者
Sifan Hu
Yu Cheng
Rong Pan
Fasheng Zou
Tien Ming Lee
机构
[1] Sun Yat-Sen University,School of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control
[2] Sun Yat-Sen University,School of Computer Science and Engineering
[3] Guangdong Academy of Science,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology
[4] Sun Yat-Sen University,School of Ecology
[5] University of Oxford,Oxford Martin School
来源
Ambio | 2022年 / 51卷
关键词
Conservation; Cost-effectiveness; Online seizure news; Public whistle-blowing; Social feedback; Threatened species;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Illegal wildlife trade enforcement is a cornerstone conservation strategy worldwide, yet we have a limited understanding on its social impacts. Using Chinese online wildlife seizure news (2003–2018), we evaluated the interactions among enforcement operations, news frequency, and social engagement (i.e., whistle-blowing) frequency. Our results showed that intensive enforcement operations, which commenced after 2012, have social impacts by increasing the frequency of all seizure news significantly by 28% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5%, 51%] and those via whistle-blowing by 24% [95% CI: 2%, 45%], when compared to counterfactual models where possible confounding factors were accounted for. Furthermore, we revealed the potential interaction between enforcement seizure news with and without social engagement, and the consequential social feedback process. Of the species identified from ‘whistle-blowing’ news, up to 28% are considered as high conservation priorities. Overall, we expanded our understanding of the enforcement impacts to social dimensions, which could contribute to improving the cost-effectiveness of such conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:1643 / 1657
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The fight against the illegal wildlife trade
    Bernard, Tiphaine
    [J]. CRIMINOLOGIE, 2016, 49 (02) : 71 - 93
  • [32] CRACKING DOWN ON ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE
    HOLDEN, C
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1979, 206 (4420) : 801 - 802
  • [33] Souvenirs, Shells, and the Illegal Wildlife Trade
    Nijman, Vincent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 2019, 39 (02) : 282 - 296
  • [34] The nature and extent of legal and illegal trade in wildlife
    Broad, S
    Mulliken, T
    Roe, D
    [J]. TRADE IN WILDLIFE: REGULATION FOR CONSERVATION, 2003, : 3 - 22
  • [35] Gender and illegal wildlife trade: overlooked and underestimated
    Seager, Joni
    Parry-Jones, Rob
    Leger, Tamara
    [J]. ORYX, 2021, 55 (05) : 653 - 654
  • [36] Illegal Wildlife Trade: Prospects for Economic Sociology
    Ermolin, Ilya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY-EKONOMICHESKAYA SOTSIOLOGIYA, 2024, 25 (02): : 120 - 147
  • [37] Security and Conservation: The Politics of the Illegal Wildlife Trade
    Dalby, Simon
    Duffy, Rosaleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2024, 60 (07): : 1163 - 1164
  • [38] Internet companies combat illegal wildlife trade
    Burton, Adrian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (08) : 404 - 404
  • [39] Illegal Wildlife Trade: Scale, Processes, and Governance
    't Sas-Rolfes, Michael
    Challender, Daniel W. S.
    Hinsley, Amy
    Verissimo, Diogo
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 44, 2019, 44 : 201 - 228
  • [40] Emerging trends of the illegal wildlife trade in Mesoamerica
    Gluszek, Sarah
    Ariano-Sanchez, Daniel
    Cremona, Patricia
    Goyenechea, Alejandra
    Luque Vergara, Dario Antonio
    Mcloughlin, Lee
    Morales, Alejandro
    Reuter Cortes, Adrian
    Rodriguez Fonseca, Javier
    Radachowsky, Jeremy
    Knight, Andrew
    [J]. ORYX, 2021, 55 (05) : 708 - 716