A review of the impacts of biological invasions in South Africa

被引:0
|
作者
Brian W. van Wilgen
Tsungai A. Zengeya
David M. Richardson
机构
[1] Stellenbosch University,Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology
[2] South African National Biodiversity Institute,Kirstenbosch Research Centre
[3] University of Pretoria,Department of Zoology and Entomology, Centre for Invasion Biology
来源
Biological Invasions | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
Biodiversity; Economic impact; EICAT; Indicators; SEICAT; Tree invasions; Water resources;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Compared to other facets of invasion science, the impacts of biological invasions have been understudied, but many studies have been published in the last decade. This paper reviews the growing body of evidence of impacts of invasions in South Africa. We classified information for individual species into ten ecological and four social categories of impact. We also reviewed studies that upscaled this information to larger spatial scales, as well as progress with assigning invasive species to impact severity categories. We identified 123 studies that documented the impacts of 71 invasive alien species, about 5 of the country’s naturalized alien biota. The most frequently reported impact category was species interactions (changes to habitat suitability, pollination networks or seed dispersal mechanisms), followed by direct competition, changes to ecosystem functioning (hydrology or nutrient dynamics), hybridization and predation. Trees and shrubs accounted for more than half of the species studied, but there were examples from most other groups of plants and animals. The social consequences of invasions have been less well studied at the level of individual species. Most studies (72%) considered the impacts of a single species, based on data collected on < 1 ha, and were completed in less than a year. Space-for-time substitution was widely used, but widespread collection of data from numerous small plots allowed for reporting impact over larger spatial scales. We also identified seven studies that either monitored impacts over longer periods (up to 40 years), or repeated surveys in the same area to assess change over time. Prominent landscape-scale impacts included reductions in water resources, the attrition of native biodiversity, reductions in rangeland productivity, predation of marine birds and freshwater fishes, and disease organisms affecting native mammals and trees. Nineteen studies at broader scales estimated substantial impacts on landscape-scale water yield, habitats and biodiversity, rangeland productivity, and the economic value of ecosystem services. Despite considerable progress, our understanding remains fragmentary. Impacts are expected to grow as invasions enter exponential phases of spread and densification and as the duration of invasions increases. A robust understanding needs to be developed to provide justification for management costs.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 50
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The economic costs of biological invasions in Africa: a growing but neglected threat?
    Diagne, Christophe
    Turbelin, Anna J.
    Moodley, Desika
    Novoa, Ana
    Leroy, Boris
    Angulo, Elena
    Adamjy, Tasnime
    Dia, Cheikh A. K. M.
    Taheri, Ahmed
    Tambo, Justice
    Dobigny, Gauthier
    Courchamp, Franck
    NEOBIOTA, 2021, 67 : 11 - 51
  • [32] Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments: A review and potential impacts in South Africa
    Ngqwala, Nosiphiwe P.
    Muchesa, Petros
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2020, 116 (7-8) : 42 - 48
  • [33] Psidium cattleyanum (Myrtaceae) invasions in South Africa: Status and prognosis
    Mbobo, Tumeka
    Richardson, David M.
    Gwynne-Evans, David
    Deacon, James
    Wilson, John R. U.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2022, 150 : 412 - 419
  • [34] A brief history of marine bio-invasions in South Africa
    Griffiths, C. L.
    Mead, A.
    Robinson, T. B.
    AFRICAN ZOOLOGY, 2009, 44 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [35] Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: Including the costs but not the benefits
    Boltovskoy, Demetrio
    Guiasu, Radu
    Burlakova, Lyubov
    Karatayev, Alexander
    Schlaepfer, Martin A.
    Correa, Nancy
    AMBIO, 2022, 51 (08) : 1786 - 1799
  • [36] Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: Including the costs but not the benefits
    Demetrio Boltovskoy
    Radu Guiaşu
    Lyubov Burlakova
    Alexander Karatayev
    Martin A. Schlaepfer
    Nancy Correa
    Ambio, 2022, 51 : 1786 - 1799
  • [37] The potential for kelp (order Laminariales) aquaculture in South Africa: a biological review
    Bolton, John J.
    Rothman, Mark D.
    BOTANICA MARINA, 2024,
  • [38] Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review
    Macic, Vesna
    Albano, Paolo G.
    Almpanidou, Vasiliki
    Claudet, Joachim
    Corrales, Xavier
    Essl, Franz
    Evagelopoulos, Athanasios
    Giovos, Ioannis
    Jimenez, Carlos
    Kark, Salit
    Markovic, Olivera
    Mazaris, Antonios D.
    Olafsdottir, Gudbjorg A.
    Panayotova, Marina
    Petovic, Slavica
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Ramdani, Mohammed
    Rilov, Gil
    Tricarico, Elena
    Fernandez, Tomas Vega
    Sini, Maria
    Trygonis, Vasilis
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [39] The economic analysis of biological invasions control: a literature review
    Fresard, Marjolaine
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2011, 121 (04): : 489 - 525
  • [40] Biological Invasions
    Daniel Simberloff
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 1998, 7 (5) : 697 - 699