Estimating production in ducks: a comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys

被引:0
|
作者
Hannu Pöysä
Juho Kotilainen
Veli-Matti Väänänen
Mervi Kunnasranta
机构
[1] Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke),Natural Resources
[2] University of Helsinki,Department of Forest Sciences
[3] University of Eastern Finland,Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences
来源
关键词
Brood size; Drone; Multicopter; Species detection; Waterbird census;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We tested the use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in duck brood surveys in boreal wetlands in Finland. We performed brood surveys at the same wetlands concurrently with ground-based point counts and using a UAS (multicopter; drone counts) equipped with a camera that produced high-quality images for identification of broods and ducklings. The number of broods did not differ between point counts and drone counts in three duck species, the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), common teal (Anas crecca), and common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). The number of ducklings was higher in drone counts than in point counts in the common teal, but no such difference was found in the mallard and common goldeneye. UAS-based images seem to be useful for estimating numbers of both broods and ducklings for different duck species, although the manual processing of images is labor intensive.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Testing the validity of national drug surveys: comparison between a general population cohort and household surveys
    Charles, Hannah
    Heron, Jon
    Hickman, Matthew
    Brown, Jamie
    Hines, Lindsey
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2021, 116 (08) : 2076 - 2083
  • [22] A comparison of methods for estimating relative abundances in bottom longline fishery surveys
    Haimovici, Manuel
    Avila-da-Silva, Antonio Olinto
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2007, 85 (1-2) : 226 - 231
  • [23] Detectability of Lesser Prairie-Chicken Leks: A Comparison of Surveys From Aircraft
    McRoberts, Jon T.
    Butler, Matthew J.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    Whitlaw, Heather A.
    Haukos, David A.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (04): : 771 - 778
  • [24] Clustering in galaxy distribution: comparison between redshift surveys
    Montuori, M
    Pietronero, L
    Bottaccio, M
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 305 (1-2) : 242 - 246
  • [25] Comparison between Canadian Canola Harvest and Export Surveys
    Barthet, Veronique J.
    [J]. PLANTS-BASEL, 2016, 5 (03): : 1209 - 1214
  • [26] Estimating ground surface visibility on thermal images from drone wildlife surveys in forests
    Pagacz, Stanis law
    Witczuk, Julia
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 78
  • [27] Comparison of sampling precision for nearshore marine wildlife using unmanned and manned aerial surveys
    Kelaher, Brendan P.
    Peddemors, Victor M.
    Hoade, Brent
    Colefax, Andrew P.
    Butcher, Paul A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2020, 8 (01): : 30 - 43
  • [28] Estimating Occupancy of Rare Fishes Using Visual Surveys, with a Comparison to Backpack Electrofishing
    Albanese, Brett
    Owers, Katharine A.
    Weiler, Deborah A.
    Pruitt, William
    [J]. SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2011, 10 (03) : 423 - 442
  • [29] Estimating the population burden of injuries - A comparison of household surveys and emergency department surveillance
    Petridou, E
    Dessypris, N
    Frangakis, CE
    Belechri, M
    Mavrou, A
    Trichopoulos, D
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (04) : 428 - 432
  • [30] Performing low-altitude photogrammetric surveys, a comparative analysis of user-grade unmanned aircraft systems
    Francesco Mugnai
    Pietro Longinotti
    Francesco Vezzosi
    Grazia Tucci
    [J]. Applied Geomatics, 2022, 14 : 211 - 223