Estimating production in ducks: a comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys

被引:0
|
作者
Hannu Pöysä
Juho Kotilainen
Veli-Matti Väänänen
Mervi Kunnasranta
机构
[1] Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke),Natural Resources
[2] University of Helsinki,Department of Forest Sciences
[3] University of Eastern Finland,Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences
来源
关键词
Brood size; Drone; Multicopter; Species detection; Waterbird census;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We tested the use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in duck brood surveys in boreal wetlands in Finland. We performed brood surveys at the same wetlands concurrently with ground-based point counts and using a UAS (multicopter; drone counts) equipped with a camera that produced high-quality images for identification of broods and ducklings. The number of broods did not differ between point counts and drone counts in three duck species, the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), common teal (Anas crecca), and common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). The number of ducklings was higher in drone counts than in point counts in the common teal, but no such difference was found in the mallard and common goldeneye. UAS-based images seem to be useful for estimating numbers of both broods and ducklings for different duck species, although the manual processing of images is labor intensive.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating production in ducks: a comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys
    Poysa, Hannu
    Kotilainen, Juho
    Vaeaenaenen, Veli-Matti
    Kunnasranta, Mervi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 64 (06)
  • [2] Applications of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Waterbird Surveys
    Dulava, Sharon
    Bean, William T.
    Richmond, Orien M. W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2015, 17 (03) : 201 - 210
  • [3] Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
    Groves, Phillip A.
    Alcorn, Brad
    Wiest, Michelle M.
    Maselko, Jacek M.
    Connor, William P.
    [J]. FACETS, 2016, 1 : 187 - 204
  • [4] A Comparative Analysis of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Low Altitude Photogrammetric Surveys
    Mugnai, Francesco
    Tucci, Grazia
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [5] Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Low-Altitude Aerial Surveys
    Watts, Adam C.
    Perry, John H.
    Smith, Scot E.
    Burgess, Matthew A.
    Wilkinson, Benjamin E.
    Szantoi, Zoltan
    Ifju, Peter G.
    Percival, H. Franklin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (07): : 1614 - 1619
  • [6] Estimating the maximum interval between repeat surveys
    Brown, JA
    Harris, S
    Timmins, SM
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 29 (06) : 631 - 636
  • [7] Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys
    Barnas, Andrew
    Newman, Robert
    Felege, Christopher J.
    Corcoran, Michael P.
    Hervey, Samuel D.
    Stechmann, Tanner J.
    Rockwell, Robert F.
    Ellis-Felege, Susan N.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (02): : 1328 - 1338
  • [8] How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
    Paulsen, Ingrid Marie Garfelt
    Pedersen, Ashild Onvik
    Hann, Richard
    Blanchet, Marie-Anne
    Eischeid, Isabell
    van Hazendonk, Charlotte
    Ravolainen, Virve Tuulia
    Stien, Audun
    Le Moullec, Mathilde
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [9] Applying ASPRS Accuracy Standards to Surveys from Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
    Whitehead, Ken
    Hugenholtz, Chris H.
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 81 (10): : 787 - 793
  • [10] ESTIMATING BIAS IN AERIAL SURVEYS OF HARP SEAL PUP PRODUCTION
    MYERS, RA
    BOWEN, WD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (02): : 361 - 372