Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in elderly or unfit patients with non-small cell lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
G D Beretta
G Michetti
M O Belometti
G Gritti
A Quadri
P Poletti
R Labianca
机构
[1] Medical Oncology Unit,
[2] Pneumology Unit,undefined
[3] Radiotherapy Unit,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2000年 / 83卷
关键词
elderly patients; unfit patients; NSCLC; gemcitabine; vinorelbine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cisplatin-based combinations are efficacious in increasing the overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their toxicity makes them unsuitable for elderly and unfit patients. The primary objective of this non-randomized phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility and activity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine combination in previously untreated elderly and/or unfit patients with measurable stage III or IV NSCLC. Forty-three patients aged ≥ 65 years or with contraindications against cisplatin treatment (36 males and seven females: median age 66 years; range 48–75: PS 0 = 11, PS 1 = 19, PS 2 = 13) received intravenous (i.v.) gemcitabine 1000 mg m–2, followed by vinorelbine 25 mg m–2 i.v. on day 1 and 8 every 21 days. Fifteen patients (34.9%) achieved partial remission (confidence interval: 27.6–42.2%) for a median duration of 6 months; the median survival of these patients has not yet been reached. A further 15 had stable disease for a median of 4 months and a median survival of 7 months. The 10 patients (23.2%) who experienced disease progression had a median survival of 4 months. Three patients are not evaluable. The 1-year actuarial survival rate is 31.1%. The treatment was well tolerated: only 35% of the patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia on day 14, none experienced episodes of neutropenic fever, and there was no evidence of severe haematological toxicity upon recycling. Only 9% of the patients suffered from gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 3); increased but reversible transaminase levels were observed in 11.6%. In conclusion, the results of this phase II study show that the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is active and well tolerated in NSCLC, and thus encourage its use in elderly or unfit patients. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 576
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized study of vinorelbine-gemcitabine versus vinorelbine-carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Tan, EH
    Szczesna, A
    Krzakowski, M
    Macha, HN
    Gatzemeier, U
    Mattson, K
    Wernli, M
    Reiterer, P
    Hui, R
    Von Pawel, J
    Bertetto, O
    Pouget, JC
    Burillon, JP
    Parlier, Y
    Abratt, R
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [42] Options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review and report on a phase II study of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine
    Lilenbaum, R
    ONCOLOGIST, 2001, 6 : 16 - 19
  • [43] Gemcitabine Plus Platinum Combination Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
    Chun, Sang Hoon
    Lee, Ji Eun
    Park, Mi Hee
    Kang, Jin-Hyoung
    Kim, Young Kyoon
    Wang, Young-Pil
    Park, Jae Kil
    Kim, Hoon-Kyo
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 43 (04): : 217 - 224
  • [44] Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
    C Gridelli
    L Frontini
    F Perrone
    C Gallo
    M Gulisano
    S Cigolari
    F Castiglione
    S F Robbiati
    G Gasparini
    G P Ianniello
    A Farris
    M C Locatelli
    R Felletti
    E Piazza
    British Journal of Cancer, 2000, 83 : 707 - 714
  • [45] A phase II study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination followed by sequential gefitinib monotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Kasahara, K.
    Kita, T.
    Shibata, K.
    Nishi, K.
    Ishiura, Y.
    Araya, T.
    Tambo, Y.
    Sakai, A.
    Kimura, H.
    Fujimura, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [46] Front-line weekly chemotherapy with gemcitabine for unfit patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Ferrigno, D
    Buccheri, G
    LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 (03) : 373 - 380
  • [47] Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (GV) vs vinorelbine (V) alone in elderly or frail non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Interim analysis of a SICOG phase III trial
    Frasci, G
    Lorusso, V
    Panza, N
    DeCataldis, G
    Del Gaizo, F
    Nicolella, GP
    Mascia, V
    Massidda, B
    Comella, G
    De Lena, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S249 - S249
  • [48] Gemcitabine plus docetaxel for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Similar survival to cisplatin plus vinorelbine and less toxicity
    Solomon, B
    Bunn, PA
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2005, 31 (07) : 571 - 576
  • [49] Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase III randomized trial
    Georgoulias, V.
    Ardavanis, A.
    Tsiafaki, X.
    Agelidou, A.
    Syrigos, K.
    Polyzos, A.
    Kakolyris, S.
    Kouroussis, Ch
    Androulakis, N.
    Chatzidaki, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 : 169 - 169
  • [50] Vinorelbine (VRB) plus gemcitabine (GEM) as first-line treatment for elderly patients (p) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Molecular correlates
    Maestu, I.
    Isla, D.
    Diz, P.
    Munoz, J.
    Oramas, J.
    Garcia, R.
    del Barco, S.
    Provencio, M.
    Taron, M.
    Rosell, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)