A taxonomy of load balancing algorithms and approaches in fog computing: a survey

被引:0
|
作者
Sepideh Ebneyousef
Alireza Shirmarz
机构
[1] Ale-Taha Institute of Higher Education,Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering
来源
Cluster Computing | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
Cloud computing; Fog computing; Edge computing; Load balancing; Performance; Quality of Service; Quality of Experience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
These days, cloud computing usage has been increasing with the rapid growth of Internet coverage all over the world to serve as a pay-per-use model using shared computing resources. Internet of Things (IoT) is a growing technology which is used in different applications and it needs cloud computing however the distance between cloud computing resources and the end system in IoT can cause a delay which is intolerable for delay-sensitive applications. Fog computing is a computing resource between cloud computing and end system to reduce the delay for the delay-sensitive applications in IoT. Therefore, load balancing functionality is a significant role to provide the required quality of service (QoS), quality of experience (QoE), and performance. Load balancing can be done based on response time, throughput, energy consumption, and utilization metrics. In this paper, the papers published in Elsevier, ACM, IEEE, Springer and Wiley between 2018 and 2022 have been examined to extract the load-balancing algorithms, system architecture, tools and applications, advantages and disadvantages. This review is useful for those working on load-balancing performance improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:3187 / 3208
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fog Computing Algorithms: A Survey and Research Opportunities
    Malukani, Shaifali P.
    Bhensdadia, C. K.
    APPLIED COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 2021, 26 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [32] Study of load balancing algorithms for Cloud Computing
    Handur, Vidya S.
    Belkar, Supriya
    Deshpande, Santosh
    Marakumbi, Prakash R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN COMPUTING AND INTERNET OF THINGS (ICGCIOT 2018), 2018, : 173 - 176
  • [33] aTask scheduling approaches in fog computing: A survey
    Hosseinioun, Pejman
    Kheirabadi, Maryam
    Tabbakh, Seyed Reza Kamel
    Ghaemi, Reza
    TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 33 (03)
  • [34] A Random Walk based Load Balancing Algorithm for Fog Computing
    Beraldi, Roberto
    Canali, Claudia
    Lancellotti, Riccardo
    Mattia, Gabriele Proietti
    2020 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOG AND MOBILE EDGE COMPUTING (FMEC), 2020, : 46 - 53
  • [35] Exploiting power-of-choices for load balancing in fog computing
    Beraldi, Roberto
    Alnuweiri, Hussein
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOG COMPUTING (ICFC 2019), 2019, : 80 - 86
  • [36] The Fog Balancing: Load Distribution for Small Cell Cloud Computing
    Oueis, Jessica
    Strinati, Emilio Calvanese
    Barbarossa, Sergio
    2015 IEEE 81ST VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2015,
  • [37] Comparative analysis of metaheuristic load balancing algorithms for efficient load balancing in cloud computing
    Zhou, Jincheng
    Lilhore, Umesh Kumar
    Poongodi, M.
    Hai, Tao
    Simaiya, Sarita
    Jawawi, Dayang Norhayati Abang
    Alsekait, Deemamohammed
    Ahuja, Sachin
    Biamba, Cresantus
    Hamdi, Mounir
    JOURNAL OF CLOUD COMPUTING-ADVANCES SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [38] Load Balancing Challenges in Cloud Computing: A Survey
    Khan, Rafiqul Zaman
    Ahmad, Mohammad Oqail
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL, NETWORKS, COMPUTING, AND SYSTEMS (ICSNCS 2016), VOL 2, 2016, 396 : 25 - 32
  • [39] Cloud Computing and Load Balancing in Cloud Computing-Survey
    Jyoti, Amrita
    Shrimali, Manish
    Mishra, Rashmi
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2019), 2019, : 51 - 55
  • [40] A Performance Comparison of Load Balancing Algorithms for Cloud Computing
    Islam, Tahira
    Hasan, Mohammad S.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE FRONTIERS AND ADVANCES IN DATA SCIENCE (FADS), 2017, : 158 - 163