Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis

被引:0
|
作者
Yanan Zhao
Minyue Jia
Chao Zhang
Xinxu Feng
Jifan Chen
Qunying Li
Yingying Zhang
Wen Xu
Yiping Dong
Yifan Jiang
Yajing Liu
Pintong Huang
机构
[1] The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Department of Ultrasound Medicine
[2] t,Department of Ultrasound Medicine
[3] The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,undefined
[4] GE Healthcare Clinical Education Team,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to identify the applicability of an ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in clinical practice and to compare its correlation with B-mode ultrasound (US). From May to July 2021, 63 subjects with different body mass index (BMI) grades were included in the prospective study. All of them performed UGAP measurements, under different breathing manipulations, positions, diet statuses, and operators. After that, the UGAP values were compared with the visual grades of hepatic steatosis on B-mode US using a 4-point scale method. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of the UGAP values between the two radiologists was 0.862 (p < 0.001), and the ICCs of the UGAP values on the same day and different days by radiologist A were 0.899 (p < 0.001) and 0.910 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in UGAP values under different breathing manipulations (p > 0.05), positions (p > 0.05), or diet statuses (p = 0.300). The UGAP values in the fasting (supine position, segment V, 1) condition among the lean (BMI < 24 kg/m2), overweight (24 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2) and obese groups (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) were 0.60 ± 0.12, 0.66 ± 0.14, and 0.71 ± 0.11 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.006). The correlation coefficients (Rho) between the UGAP values and the visual grades of hepatic steatosis by the two reviewers were 0.845 (p < 0.001) and 0.850 (p < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. Steatosis grades by reviewer 1 (p = 0.036) and reviewer 2 (p = 0.003) were significant factors determining the UGAP values according to the multivariate linear regression analysis. UGAP demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. UGAP may be a promising tool in clinical practice to predict hepatic steatosis.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Controlled Attenuation Parameter as a Tool for Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Living Liver Donors
    Mehta, Naimish N.
    Rajput, Manmohan
    Kumar, Karan
    Nagar, Anand
    Mahala, Vinay K.
    Saraswat, Vivek A.
    Mishra, Akash
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2025, 15 (04)
  • [42] New diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis using attenuation measurement by B mode ultrasound: Comparison with controlled attenuation parameter
    Koizumi, Y.
    Masashi, H.
    Yada, N.
    Nobuharu, T.
    Nakashima, O.
    Izumi, N.
    Kudo, M.
    Hiasa, Y.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S555 - S556
  • [43] Interobserver reproducibility of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for quantifying liver steatosis
    Giovanna Ferraioli
    Carmine Tinelli
    Raffaella Lissandrin
    Mabel Zicchetti
    Mariangela Rondanelli
    Guido Perani
    Stefano Bernuzzi
    Laura Salvaneschi
    Carlo Filice
    Hepatology International, 2014, 8 : 576 - 581
  • [44] Interobserver reproducibility of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for quantifying liver steatosis
    Ferraioli, Giovanna
    Tinelli, Carmine
    Lissandrin, Raffaella
    Zicchetti, Mabel
    Rondanelli, Mariangela
    Perani, Guido
    Bernuzzi, Stefano
    Salvaneschi, Laura
    Filice, Carlo
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 8 (04) : 576 - 581
  • [45] Tissue attenuation imaging and tissue scatter imaging for quantitative ultrasound evaluation of hepatic steatosis
    Ronaszeki, Aladar D.
    Budai, Bettina K.
    Csongrady, Barbara
    Stollmayer, Robert
    Hagymasi, Krisztina
    Werling, Klara
    Fodor, Tamas
    Folhoffer, Aniko
    Kalina, Ildiko
    Gyori, Gabriella
    Maurovich-Horvat, Pal
    Kaposi, Pal N.
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (33) : E29708
  • [46] Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatic Steatosis Using Fat Attenuation Parameter Measured by FibroTouch and a New Algorithm in CHB Patients
    Deng, Hong
    Wang, Chun-Ling
    Lai, Jing
    Yu, Su-Lin
    Xie, Dong-Ying
    Gao, Zhi-Liang
    HEPATITIS MONTHLY, 2016, 16 (09)
  • [47] The clinical value of controlled attenuation parameter for the noninvasive assessment of liver steatosis
    Ferraioli, Giovanna
    Tinelli, Carmine
    De Silvestri, Annalisa
    Lissandrin, Raffaella
    Above, Elisabetta
    Dellafiore, Carolina
    Poma, Gianluigi
    Di Gregorio, Marta
    Maiocchi, Laura
    Maserati, Renato
    Filice, Carlo
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 36 (12) : 1860 - 1866
  • [48] Development and evaluation of an ultrasound-guided tracking and gating system for hepatic radiotherapy
    Jacso, Ferenc
    Kouznetsov, Alexei
    Smith, Wendy L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (12) : 5633 - 5640
  • [49] Reproducibility of freehand calibrations for ultrasound-guided needle navigation
    Perrin, Sydney
    Baum, Zachary
    Asselin, Mark
    Underwood, Grace
    Choueib, Saleh
    Lia, Hillary
    Ungi, Tamas
    Lasso, Andras
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2019, 10951
  • [50] Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Indian Patients
    Rout, Gyanranjan
    Kedia, Saurabh
    Nayak, Baibaswata
    Yadav, Rajni
    Das, Prasenjit
    Acharya, Subrat K.
    Gunjan, Deepak
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    Mahanta, Mousumi
    Gupta, Swatantra
    Aggarwal, Sandeep
    Shalimar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 9 (01) : 13 - 21