Land use and management change under climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies: a U.S. case study

被引:0
|
作者
Jianhong E. Mu
Anne M. Wein
Bruce A. McCarl
机构
[1] Oregon State University,Department of Applied Economics
[2] U.S. Geological Survey,Western Geographic Science Center
[3] Texas A&M University,Department of Agricultural Economics
关键词
Land use and management change; Climate change; Adaptation; Mitigation; Greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the effects of crop management adaptation and climate mitigation strategies on land use and land management, plus on related environmental and economic outcomes. We find that crop management adaptation (e.g. crop mix, new species) increases Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.7 % under a more severe climate projection while a carbon price reduces total forest and agriculture GHG annual flux by 15 % and 9 %, respectively. This shows that trade-offs are likely between mitigation and adaptation. Climate change coupled with crop management adaptation has small and mostly negative effects on welfare; mitigation, which is implemented as a carbon price starting at $15 per metric ton carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent with a 5 % annual increase rate, bolsters welfare carbon payments. When both crop management adaptation and carbon price are implemented the effects of the latter dominates.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1054
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change and spatial planning Starting points for mitigation and adaptation to climate change in regional planning and land use planning
    Fleischhauer, Mark
    Bomefeld, Benjamin
    [J]. RAUMFORSCHUNG UND RAUMORDNUNG-SPATIAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING, 2006, 64 (03): : 161 - 171
  • [32] Assessing Effects of Mitigation Strategies for Global Climate Change with an Intertemporal Model of the U.S. Forest and Agriculture Sectors
    RALPH ALIG
    DARIUS ADAMS
    BRUCE MCCARL
    J.M. CALLAWAY
    STEVEN WINNETT
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 9 (3) : 259 - 274
  • [33] Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors
    Alig R.
    Adams D.
    McCarl B.
    Callaway J.M.
    Winnett S.
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 9 (3) : 259 - 274
  • [34] Adaptation of Land Use to Climate Change in Russia
    Sukhoveeva, O. E.
    [J]. RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 830 - 834
  • [35] Adaptation of Land Use to Climate Change in Russia
    O. E. Sukhoveeva
    [J]. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2020, 45 : 830 - 834
  • [36] Farmer's intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies
    Niles, Meredith T.
    Brown, Margaret
    Dynes, Robyn
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 135 (02) : 277 - 295
  • [37] Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies
    Meredith T. Niles
    Margaret Brown
    Robyn Dynes
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2016, 135 : 277 - 295
  • [38] Climate Change and Western Public Lands: a Survey of U.S. Federal Land Managers on the Status of Adaptation Efforts
    Archie, Kelli M.
    Dilling, Lisa
    Milford, Jana B.
    Pampel, Fred C.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (04):
  • [39] A meta-analysis of urban climate change adaptation planning in the U.S.
    Hughes, Sara
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2015, 14 : 17 - 29
  • [40] Adaptation strategies and land productivity of banana farmers under climate change in China
    Zhu, Yueji
    Yang, Qi
    Zhang, Cheng
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 34