Landscape complexity in space and time

被引:0
|
作者
D. J. Walker
N. C. Kenkel
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Botany
来源
Community Ecology | 2001年 / 2卷
关键词
Diversity; Landsat; Multifractals; Pattern; Physiography; Profile analysis; Succession;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscape complexity in the boreal forest is a function of physiographic complexity (spatial processes) and post-fire successional (temporal) processes operating across scales. In this study we examine the role of succession and topographic complexity in determining the landscape complexity of Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba, Canada. Landscape complexity is assessed by using multifractal analysis to quantify landscape patterns from Landsat TM imagery. To determine whether complexity changes with age, “young” sites (post-fire stand ages = 11 and 30 years) were matched with adjacent “old” sites (post-fire stand ages >95 years). The influence of physiography on landscape complexity is examined by comparing sites having “simple” and “complex” physiographies (as determined by fractal surface analysis). The scaling properties of landscape complexity are determined by calculating the multifractal spectrum (Dq) for each site. Landscape complexity increases during early succession; multifractal profiles of 11 year old sites are lower than those of adjacent older stands. However, the multifractal profiles of 30 year old and adjacent older stands are indistinguishable, suggesting that change in landscape complexity occurs within 30 years following fire. Physiographically “complex” sites have consistently greater landscape complexity than adjacent “simple” sites. We conclude that landscape complexity increases over time as succession proceeds, and in space along a gradient from “simple” to “complex” physiographies. It follows that landscape complexity is lowest in early-successional, physiographically “simple” sites and highest in late-successional, physiographically “complex” sites.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 110
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quaternary landscape ecology: Relevant scales in space and time
    Delcourt, Hazel R.
    Delcourt, Paul A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1988, 2 (01) : 23 - 44
  • [42] VALUE CONCEPTS OF "LANDSCAPE" AND "GEOSYSTEM" IN GEOGRAPHICAL SPACE AND TIME
    Dzagoeva, Yekaterina A.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2012, (357): : 182 - +
  • [43] Space and Time Scales in Human-Landscape Systems
    G. Mathias Kondolf
    Kristen Podolak
    Environmental Management, 2014, 53 : 76 - 87
  • [44] Complexity of landscape management
    Hasler, B
    Veihe, A
    Kjellerup, U
    Wedderburn, L
    MULTIFUNCTIONAL LANDSCAPES, VOL II: MONITORING, DIVERSITY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 15 : 287 - 292
  • [45] Complexity and the memory of landscape
    Leeder, Mike
    NATURE, 2011, 469 (7328) : 39 - 39
  • [46] Reducing the Space-Time Complexity of the CMA-ES
    Knight, James N.
    Lunacek, Monte
    GECCO 2007: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, 2007, : 658 - 665
  • [47] A NOTE ON THE DENSITY OF ORACLE DECREASING TIME-SPACE COMPLEXITY
    DURIS, P
    ROLIM, JDP
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1994, 132 (1-2) : 435 - 444
  • [48] The paradoxical habits of busyness and the complexity of intimate time-space
    Holdsworth, Clare
    SOCIAL & CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 23 (04) : 485 - 501
  • [49] On the Time and Space Complexity of Genetic Programming for Evolving Boolean Conjunctions
    Lissovoi, Andrei
    Oliveto, Pietro S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 66 : 655 - 689
  • [50] Complexity Reduced Detection For Virtual Layered Space Time Receivers
    Ohnishi, Ryota
    Denno, Satoshi
    Umehara, Daisuke
    Morikura, Masahiro
    2010 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL INDOOR AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), 2010, : 587 - 592