Landscape complexity in space and time

被引:0
|
作者
D. J. Walker
N. C. Kenkel
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Botany
来源
Community Ecology | 2001年 / 2卷
关键词
Diversity; Landsat; Multifractals; Pattern; Physiography; Profile analysis; Succession;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscape complexity in the boreal forest is a function of physiographic complexity (spatial processes) and post-fire successional (temporal) processes operating across scales. In this study we examine the role of succession and topographic complexity in determining the landscape complexity of Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba, Canada. Landscape complexity is assessed by using multifractal analysis to quantify landscape patterns from Landsat TM imagery. To determine whether complexity changes with age, “young” sites (post-fire stand ages = 11 and 30 years) were matched with adjacent “old” sites (post-fire stand ages >95 years). The influence of physiography on landscape complexity is examined by comparing sites having “simple” and “complex” physiographies (as determined by fractal surface analysis). The scaling properties of landscape complexity are determined by calculating the multifractal spectrum (Dq) for each site. Landscape complexity increases during early succession; multifractal profiles of 11 year old sites are lower than those of adjacent older stands. However, the multifractal profiles of 30 year old and adjacent older stands are indistinguishable, suggesting that change in landscape complexity occurs within 30 years following fire. Physiographically “complex” sites have consistently greater landscape complexity than adjacent “simple” sites. We conclude that landscape complexity increases over time as succession proceeds, and in space along a gradient from “simple” to “complex” physiographies. It follows that landscape complexity is lowest in early-successional, physiographically “simple” sites and highest in late-successional, physiographically “complex” sites.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 110
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Landscape complexity in space and time
    Walker, D. J.
    Kenkel, N. C.
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2001, 2 (01) : 109 - 110
  • [2] Time and Space Complexity for Splicing Systems
    Loos, Remco
    Ogihara, Mitsunori
    THEORY OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2010, 47 (02) : 301 - 316
  • [3] Space, time and complexity in biomembrane models
    Gaber, BP
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 1998, 16 (4-6): : 289 - 289
  • [4] Time and space complexity of reversible pebbling
    Královic, R
    RAIRO-THEORETICAL INFORMATICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, 38 (02): : 137 - 161
  • [5] Time and Space Complexity for Splicing Systems
    Remco Loos
    Mitsunori Ogihara
    Theory of Computing Systems, 2010, 47 : 301 - 316
  • [6] Landscape sensitivity in time and space - an introduction
    Thomas, MF
    CATENA, 2001, 42 (2-4) : 83 - 98
  • [7] The African landscape through space and time
    Paul, Jonathan D.
    Roberts, Gareth G.
    White, Nicky
    TECTONICS, 2014, 33 (06) : 898 - 935
  • [8] Effects of landscape complexity on crop productivity: An assessment from space
    Nguyen, Lan H.
    Robinson, Samuel V. J.
    Galpern, Paul
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 328
  • [9] Space and time complexity for infinite time Turing machines
    Carl, Merlin
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 30 (06) : 1239 - 1255
  • [10] Preserving "Time" in Space and "Space" in Time: Cultural Urban Landscape of Nis, Serbia
    Rakocija, Jelena
    BEST PRACTICES IN HERITAGE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT: FROM THE WORLD TO POMPEII, 2014, (46): : 653 - 661