Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

被引:0
|
作者
Jingyu Guo
Wei Wei
Lixing Zhan
机构
[1] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Food Safety Research, Institute for Nutritional Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
[2] Ministry of Health,Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment
来源
关键词
Red meat; Processed meat; Prospective studies; Meta-analysis; Breast cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Epidemiological studies regarding the association between red and processed meat intake and the risk of breast cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis which included 14 prospective studies to evaluate the association of red and processed meat intake with breast cancer risk. Relevant prospective cohort studies were identified by searching PubMed through October 31, 2014, and by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved articles. Study-specific relative risk (RR) estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. Fourteen prospective studies on red meat (involving 31,552 cases) and 12 prospective studies on processed meat were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RRs (95 % CI) of breast cancer for the highest versus the lowest categories were 1.10 (1.02, 1.19) for red meat, and 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) for processed meat. The estimated summary RRs (95 % CI) were 1.11 (1.05, 1.16) for an increase of 120 g/day of red meat, and 1.09 (1.03, 1.16) for an increase of 50 g/day of processed meat. Our findings indicate that increased intake of red and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Further research with well-designed cohort or interventional studies is needed to confirm the association.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Guo, Jingyu
    Wei, Wei
    Zhan, Lixing
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 151 (01) : 191 - 198
  • [2] Association between red and processed meat with breast cancer: Comment on “Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies” by Guo et al.
    Ran Xu
    Jing Zhu
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 173 : 241 - 242
  • [3] A review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of red and processed meat intake and prostate cancer
    Alexander, Dominik D.
    Mink, Pamela J.
    Cushing, Colleen A.
    Sceurman, Bonnie
    [J]. NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2010, 9
  • [4] A review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of red and processed meat intake and prostate cancer
    Dominik D Alexander
    Pamela J Mink
    Colleen A Cushing
    Bonnie Sceurman
    [J]. Nutrition Journal, 9
  • [5] Association betweenred and processed meat with breast cancer: Comment on "Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies" by Guo et al.
    Xu, Ran
    Zhu, Jing
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 173 (01) : 241 - 242
  • [6] Red and processed meat intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
    Li, Fei
    An, Shengli
    Hou, Lina
    Chen, Pengliang
    Lei, Chengyong
    Tan, Wanlong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (08): : 2100 - 2110
  • [7] RED AND PROCESSED MEAT INTAKE AND RISK OF BLADDER CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS
    Fei, L.
    Wan-Long, T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25
  • [8] Red and processed meat consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of prospective studies
    S C Larsson
    A Wolk
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 106 : 603 - 607
  • [9] Red and processed meat consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Larsson, S. C.
    Wolk, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (03) : 603 - 607
  • [10] Comment on 'Red and processed meat consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of prospective studies'
    Lightsey, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (04) : 754 - 755