The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies

被引:0
|
作者
J. Leifeld
L. Menichetti
机构
[1] Agroscope,
[2] Climate and Agriculture Group,undefined
[3] Now Ecology,undefined
[4] SLU (Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet),undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil carbon sequestration and avoidable emissions through peatland restoration are both strategies to tackle climate change. Here we compare their potential and environmental costs regarding nitrogen and land demand. In the event that no further areas are exploited, drained peatlands will cumulatively release 80.8 Gt carbon and 2.3 Gt nitrogen. This corresponds to a contemporary annual greenhouse gas emission of 1.91 (0.31–3.38) Gt CO2-eq. that could be saved with peatland restoration. Soil carbon sequestration on all agricultural land has comparable mitigation potential. However, additional nitrogen is needed to build up a similar carbon pool in organic matter of mineral soils, equivalent to 30–80% of the global fertilizer nitrogen application annually. Restoring peatlands is 3.4 times less nitrogen costly and involves a much smaller land area demand than mineral soil carbon sequestration, calling for a stronger consideration of peatland rehabilitation as a mitigation measure.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate Change Mitigation Assessing Strategies that Offer Potential Human Health Benefits
    Barrett, Julia R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 122 (05) : A139 - A139
  • [22] Tropical Forests and Climate Change Mitigation: The Global Potential and Cases from the Philippines
    Lasco, Rodel D.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 5 (01): : 81 - 98
  • [23] Tropical peatlands and their contribution to the global carbon cycle and climate change
    Ribeiro, Kelly
    Pacheco, Felipe S.
    Ferreira, Jose W.
    de Sousa-Neto, Eraclito R.
    Hastie, Adam
    Krieger Filho, Guenther C.
    Alvala, Plinio C.
    Forti, Maria C.
    Ometto, Jean P.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (03) : 489 - 505
  • [24] Weighing the risks of climate change mitigation strategies
    Mills, Evan
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2012, 68 (06) : 67 - 78
  • [25] CLIMATE CHANGE: A CALL FOR ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES
    Chaubey, I.
    Bosch, D. D.
    Munoz-Carpena, R.
    Harmel, R. Daren
    Douglas-Mankin, K. R.
    Nejadhashemi, A. P.
    Srivastava, P.
    Shirmohammadi, A.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2016, 59 (06) : 1709 - 1713
  • [26] Photovoltaic fields largely outperform afforestation efficiency in global climate change mitigation strategies
    Stern, Rafael
    Muller, Jonathan D.
    Rotenberg, Eyal
    Amer, Madi
    Segev, Lior
    Yakir, Dan
    [J]. PNAS NEXUS, 2023, 2 (11):
  • [27] Climate change mitigation on tropical peatlands: A triple burden for smallholder farmers in Indonesia
    Merten, Jennifer
    Nielsen, Jonas Ostergaard
    Rosyani
    Faust, Heiko
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 71
  • [28] Representing global climate change, adaptation and mitigation
    Barker, T
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [29] Global Climate Change Mitigation: Strategic Incentives
    Perdana, Sigit
    Tyers, Rod
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (03): : 183 - 206
  • [30] Energy security and global climate change mitigation
    Huntington, HG
    Brown, SPA
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) : 715 - 718