Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents’ annoyance level

被引:0
|
作者
Kyungah Kim
Jungwoo Shin
Myoungjin Oh
Jung-Kyu Jung
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering
[2] Kyung Hee University,Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering
[3] Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP),Office of R&D Budget and Feasibility Analysis
关键词
Annoyance level; Contingent valuation method; Economic value; Traffic noise;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Noise is the most frequently encountered type of environmental pollution in everyday life and has a direct negative effect on humans. Individuals who are constantly exposed to noise tend to have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and hypertension. Noise sources range from construction sites to political rallies and assemblies, but traffic is one of the most long-lasting and chronic sources of noise. Previously, researchers have conducted valuations of road traffic noise reduction, but they did not consider residents’ annoyance levels in response to traffic noise. However, individuals’ annoyance levels affect the economic value of noise reduction policies and thus must be considered to obtain an accurate estimate. Therefore, this study investigated residents’ willingness to pay for traffic noise reduction depending on their annoyance level. We used the contingent valuation method and a survey to analyze how much 1022 respondents in Korea were willing to pay for noise reduction. We found that people who were annoyed and extremely annoyed by noise had a willingness to pay KRW 8422 (US $7.55) and KRW 9848 (US $8.83) annually per household, respectively, to reduce their annoyance level to zero. In addition, we determined the economic benefits of noise reduction policies using the respondents’ willingness to pay to reduce noise by 1 dB(A), which totaled KRW 3.28 billion (US $2.91 million) per year. The results of this study provide estimates of the annual benefits of traffic noise reduction considering residents’ annoyance level.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:7243 / 7255
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TO THE QUESTION ON THE REDUCTION OF NOISE LEVEL WHILE TRAFFIC TRAFFIC AT THE TRAILS
    Chepik, Yu. G.
    SCIENCE & TECHNIQUE, 2010, (03): : 66 - 71
  • [22] Road, Tram and Aircraft Traffic Noise Annoyance Related to the Number of Noise Events and the Equivalent Sound Level
    Felcyn, Jan
    Ptak, Patrycja
    ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS, 2022, 47 (04) : 457 - 467
  • [23] ANNOYANCE AND SPEECH INTERFERENCE OF IMPULSE AND TRAFFIC NOISE
    FANG Zhi MA Mouchao WANG Naiyi and JIN Lingjuan(Institute of Psychology
    Chinese Journal of Acoustics, 1989, (01) : 72 - 79
  • [24] TRAFFIC NOISE AND ANNOYANCE UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS
    VOIGT, P
    PELLI, T
    LAUBER, A
    NENECEK, J
    GRANDJEAN, E
    ERGONOMICS, 1974, 17 (04) : 558 - 558
  • [26] TRAFFIC NOISE - ANNOYANCE ESTIMATION IN GENEVA AND SCANDINAVIA
    BJORKMAN, M
    RYLANDER, R
    AHRLIN, U
    SNELLA, MC
    SOZIAL-UND PRAVENTIVMEDIZIN, 1979, 24 (04): : 247 - 248
  • [27] Annoyance from road traffic noise: A review
    Ouis, D
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) : 101 - 120
  • [28] Urban road traffic noise and noise annoyance-a study on perceived noise control and its value among the elderly
    Riedel, Natalie
    Koeckler, Heike
    Scheiner, Joachim
    van Kamp, Irene
    Erbel, Raimund
    Loerbroks, Adrian
    Classen, Thomas
    Bolte, Gabriele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 (02): : 377 - 379
  • [29] ANNOYANCE FROM SIMULATED ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE
    RASMUSSEN, KB
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1979, 65 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [30] ASSESSMENT OF ANNOYANCE FROM ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE
    GJESTLAND, T
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1987, 112 (02) : 369 - 375