Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents’ annoyance level

被引:0
|
作者
Kyungah Kim
Jungwoo Shin
Myoungjin Oh
Jung-Kyu Jung
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering
[2] Kyung Hee University,Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering
[3] Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP),Office of R&D Budget and Feasibility Analysis
关键词
Annoyance level; Contingent valuation method; Economic value; Traffic noise;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Noise is the most frequently encountered type of environmental pollution in everyday life and has a direct negative effect on humans. Individuals who are constantly exposed to noise tend to have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and hypertension. Noise sources range from construction sites to political rallies and assemblies, but traffic is one of the most long-lasting and chronic sources of noise. Previously, researchers have conducted valuations of road traffic noise reduction, but they did not consider residents’ annoyance levels in response to traffic noise. However, individuals’ annoyance levels affect the economic value of noise reduction policies and thus must be considered to obtain an accurate estimate. Therefore, this study investigated residents’ willingness to pay for traffic noise reduction depending on their annoyance level. We used the contingent valuation method and a survey to analyze how much 1022 respondents in Korea were willing to pay for noise reduction. We found that people who were annoyed and extremely annoyed by noise had a willingness to pay KRW 8422 (US $7.55) and KRW 9848 (US $8.83) annually per household, respectively, to reduce their annoyance level to zero. In addition, we determined the economic benefits of noise reduction policies using the respondents’ willingness to pay to reduce noise by 1 dB(A), which totaled KRW 3.28 billion (US $2.91 million) per year. The results of this study provide estimates of the annual benefits of traffic noise reduction considering residents’ annoyance level.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:7243 / 7255
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents' annoyance level
    Kim, Kyungah
    Shin, Jungwoo
    Oh, Myoungjin
    Jung, Jung-Kyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (07) : 7243 - 7255
  • [2] EVALUATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE ANNOYANCE EXPERIENCED BY RESIDENTS
    SILVANI, ND
    TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & CONTROL, 1979, 20 (02): : 88 - 90
  • [3] ANNOYANCE BY TRAFFIC NOISE
    JELINKOVA, Z
    PODLAHOVA, M
    JOSIFKO, M
    VIGNEROVA, J
    ACTIVITAS NERVOSA SUPERIOR, 1981, 23 (01): : 54 - 55
  • [4] Differences in subjective loudness and annoyance depending on the road traffic noise spectrum (L)
    Torija, Antonio J.
    Flindell, Ian H.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 135 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [5] Road traffic noise annoyance in relation to average noise level, number of events and maximum noise level
    Sato, T
    Yano, T
    Björkman, M
    Rylander, R
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1999, 223 (05) : 775 - 784
  • [6] Perceived noise control and its value in the association of road traffic noise with noise annoyance
    Riedel, N.
    Koeckler, H.
    van Kamp, I.
    Scheiner, J.
    Erbel, R.
    Loerbroks, A.
    Classen, T.
    Bolte, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 109 - 110
  • [7] ANNOYANCE BY TRAFFIC NOISE AT NIGHT
    TURRIAN, V
    WEHRLI, B
    NEMECEK, J
    HOFMANN, R
    WANNER, HU
    ERGONOMICS, 1979, 22 (06) : 764 - 765
  • [8] Noise annoyance and psychological effects of traffic noise
    Jakovlievic, B
    Belojevic, G
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (04) : S142 - S142
  • [9] Annoyance of low frequency noise and traffic noise
    Mortensen, FR
    Poulsen, T
    JOURNAL OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE VIBRATION AND ACTIVE CONTROL, 2001, 20 (03): : 193 - 196
  • [10] TRAFFIC NOISE AND ANNOYANCE IN A LABORATORY CONDITION
    VOIGT, P
    PELLI, T
    LAUBER, A
    NEMECEK, J
    GRANDJEA.E
    SOZIAL-UND PRAVENTIVMEDIZIN, 1974, 19 (MAY-J): : 197 - 199