A holistic FMEA approach by fuzzy-based Bayesian network and best–worst method

被引:0
|
作者
Melih Yucesan
Muhammet Gul
Erkan Celik
机构
[1] Munzur University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Munzur University,Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management
[3] Istanbul University,Department of Transportation and Logistics
来源
关键词
Failure mode and effect analysis; Bayesian network; Trapezoidal fuzzy set; Best–worst method; Industrial kitchen equipment manufacturing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a risk analysis tool widely used in the manufacturing industry. However, traditional FMEA has limitations such as the inability to deal with uncertain failure data including subjective evaluations of experts, the absence of weight values of risk parameters, and not considering the conditionality between failure events. In this paper, we propose a holistic FMEA to overcome these limitations. The proposed approach uses the fuzzy best–worst (FBWM) method in weighting three risk parameters of FMEA, which are severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D), and to find the preference values of the failure modes according to parameters S and D. On the other side, it uses the fuzzy Bayesian network (FBN) to determine occurrence probabilities of the failure modes. Experts use a procedure using linguistic variables whose corresponding values are expressed in trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and determine the preference values of the failure modes according to parameter O in the constructed BN. Thus, the FBN including expert judgments and fuzzy set theory addresses uncertainty in failure data and includes a robust probabilistic risk analysis logic to capture the dependence between failure events. As a demonstration of the approach, a case study was conducted in an industrial kitchen equipment manufacturing facility. The results of the approach have also been compared with existed methods demonstrating its robustness.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1564
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy-Based Approach of Concept Alignment
    de Lourdes Martinez-Villasenor, Maria
    Gonzalez-Mendoza, Miguel
    UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, UCAMI 2017, 2017, 10586 : 172 - 180
  • [22] A novel fuzzy scenario-based stochastic general best-worst method
    Tavana, Madjid
    Sorooshian, Shahryar
    Rezaei, Homa
    Mina, Hassan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 252
  • [23] Approaches for multicriteria decision-making based on the hesitant fuzzy best–worst method
    Jian Li
    Li-li Niu
    Qiongxia Chen
    Zhong-xing Wang
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7 : 2617 - 2634
  • [24] Fuzzy applications of Best-Worst method in manufacturing environment
    Sofuoglu, Mehmet Alper
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (01) : 647 - 659
  • [25] Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Best-Worst Method
    Cheng, Xianjuan
    Chen, Changxiong
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 237
  • [26] Drawing a Strategy Canvas Using the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method
    Khanmohammadi E.
    Zandieh M.
    Tayebi T.
    Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2019, 20 (1) : 57 - 75
  • [27] Research on the Safety Evaluation Method for Quayside Container Cranes Based on the Best-Worst Method-Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR Approach
    Yu, Jiashuo
    Xiao, Hanbin
    Sun, Feiyue
    Yan, Likang
    Liu, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [28] A Fuzzy-Based Dynamic Provision Approach for Virtualized Network Intrusion Detection Systems
    Li, Bo
    Li, Jianxin
    Wo, Tianyu
    Wu, Xudong
    Arshad, Junaid
    Liu, Wantao
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6059 : 115 - +
  • [29] A fuzzy-based customer clustering approach with hierarchical structure for logistics network optimization
    Wang, Yong
    Ma, Xiaolei
    Lao, Yunteng
    Wang, Yinhai
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (02) : 521 - 534
  • [30] A Fuzzy-based Convolutional LSTM Network Approach for Citywide Traffic Flow Prediction
    Yu, Huiyun
    Zheng, Qi
    Qian, Shuyun
    Zhang, Yaying
    2022 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2022, : 3360 - 3367