Integrating the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) with machine learning methods for improving the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility model

被引:0
|
作者
Sunil Saha
Anik Saha
Bishnu Roy
Raju Sarkar
Dhruv Bhardwaj
Barnali Kundu
机构
[1] University of Gour Banga,Department of geography
[2] Delhi Technological University,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Earth Science Informatics | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Landslides susceptibility map; Advanced machine learning algorithms; Frequency ratio; Area under curve;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landslide is one of the serious concerns due to which, the safety and sustainability of hilly areas across the globe, become vulnerable. Therefore, preparing of landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) with the sound methods is a preliminary task for the safe and sustainable land use planning and design. In this research, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was integrated with the pre-existing machine learning techniques such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Radial Basis Functional Neural Network (RBF-net), Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPTree), Random Tree, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and M5tree to increase their efficiency and accuracy of prediction of landslide susceptibility in upper catchment of Meenachil river of Kerala. For the advancement of the ongoing research, a total of 189 landslide locations were analysed and datasets were obtained. To prepare LSMs, 70% of the total datasets was utilized for training and the rest 30% was used for the validation purposes. In this research, methods like: ROC, Precision, Proportion Incorrectly Classify, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Taylor diagram were applied for the validation of the models. Based on the prior pieces of literature, a total of twelve landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) were chosen. However, none of them found to be possessing multi-collinearity. It is challenging to select features from a dataset through optimization. In this regards PSO is effective because, it is straightforward with efficient universal optimization techniques. The PSO algorithm has updated and optimized the weights of models, and as results, the efficiency of the used models in predicting landslide susceptibility has increased. Nearly, 13% of the study area is very highly susceptible to landslide. The area under the curve (AUC) value of the Random Tree-PSO integrated model is the highest, 86.38% for the training dataset and 88.05% for the validation dataset. According to the sensitivity analysis elevation is most sensitive factor (0.285) and curvature is very less sensitive factor (0.115). As a result, it can be concluded that, of all the models evaluated, it is the most suitable for predicting a landslide tragedy.
引用
收藏
页码:2637 / 2662
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing and mapping landslide susceptibility using different machine learning methods
    Orhan, Osman
    Bilgilioglu, Suleyman Sefa
    Kaya, Zehra
    Ozcan, Adem Kursat
    Bilgilioglu, Hacer
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (10) : 2795 - 2820
  • [42] An Improved Extreme Learning Machine Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
    Han, Fei
    Yao, Hai-Fen
    Ling, Qing-Hua
    BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 6840 : 699 - +
  • [43] Particle Swarm Optimization for Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Machine Model
    Lu, Ning
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    He, Yaoyao
    Liu, Ying
    ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 283 - 286
  • [44] ViT-PSO-SVM: Cervical Cancer Predication Based on Integrating Vision Transformer with Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine
    AlMohimeed, Abdulaziz
    Shehata, Mohamed
    El-Rashidy, Nora
    Mostafa, Sherif
    Samy Talaat, Amira
    Saleh, Hager
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2024, 11 (07):
  • [45] Improving Spatial Agreement in Machine Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani
    Rahman, Md Salman
    Ahmed, Nahian
    Ahmed, Bayes
    Rabbi, Md. Fazleh
    Rahman, Rashedur M.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 23
  • [46] Integrating Particle Swarm Optimization with Learning Automata to Solve Optimization Problems in Noisy Environment
    Zhang, JunQi
    Xu, LinWei
    Li, Jie
    Kang, Qi
    Zhou, MengChu
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2014, : 1432 - 1437
  • [47] IMPROVING NEURAL NETWORKS PREDICTION ACCURACY USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION COMBINER
    Elragal, Hassan M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 19 (05) : 387 - 393
  • [48] A Combustion Kinetic Model Reduction Method based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
    Lin, Shengqiang
    Zhang, Xianfa
    Wu, You
    Zhu, Jinjiao
    Yi, Ting
    Xiong, Yonglian
    Li, Chunsheng
    Sun, Yan
    Yang, Bin
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2024, 45 (09): : 2861 - 2866
  • [49] Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis Accuracy by Particle Swarm Optimization Feature Selection
    Kazerani, Reihane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [50] Improving the subdivision accuracy of photoelectric encoder using particle swarm optimization algorithm
    Jiang, Jiaqi
    Dai, Jiahai
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Mu, Yusong
    Chang, Yunchun
    OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 2022, 54 (02)