Characterization of Foundry Waste Sand Streams for Recycling Applications in Construction Industry

被引:0
|
作者
J. K. Nyembwe
M. E. Makhatha
F. C. Banganayi
K. Nyembwe
机构
[1] Metal Casting Technology Station (UJ-MCTS) University of Johannesburg,Department of Metallurgy, School of Mining, Metallurgy and Chemical Engineering
来源
关键词
Waste Foundry Sand; Characteristics; Reuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The local South African foundry industry discharges large volumes of waste sand each year, with estimates for silica and chromite sands of 250,000 and 25,000 tons, respectively. As a developing country, South Africa is moving toward a greener environment, so the management of industrial waste is an imperative area of study. In this work, we present the laboratory analysis results of the characteristics of three waste sand streams (molding, shot blast, and dust) and discuss the feasibility of reuse options in the construction industry (including concrete mix and cement manufacturing). The results reveal that each stream has its own characteristic properties. In addition, we determined the effect of the molding binder on waste sand, especially on the shakeout sand stream. The results also demonstrate that resin knock sand features much coarser grains and less clay, sulfate, and organic content than greensand. We found the chemistry of sand stream to have the same main constituents as cement kiln feed. With respect to recycling options, we determined that the shakeout stream can be reused in both concrete mix and cement manufacturing. However, special precautions should be taken regarding the clay content of sands originating from greensand foundries. Due to its finer grain size, dust streams can only be recycled in cement manufacturing. Lastly, we found that shot blast sand failed to comply with the requirements of any of the explored recycling options due to it high density, low silica content, and high metallic debris content. The effective beneficiation of sand may involve waste stream segregation and particle size classification since the recycling options we explored (concrete mix) mainly depend upon aggregate size and the impurities present (metallic debris).
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1686
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Recycling Review of Construction Waste in China's Road Construction Industry
    Yang, Yanmei
    Wei, Shiqiang
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-8, 2012, 433-440 : 1945 - +
  • [32] WASTE FOUNDRY SAND USAGE IN CONCRETE
    Khatib, Jamal M.
    Baig, S.
    Kayali, Obada
    Kenai, S.
    Menadi, B.
    INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 858 - 863
  • [33] Reclamation and utilisation of foundry waste sand
    Kayal, Sourav
    Chakrabarti, B. K.
    HIGH TEMPERATURE MATERIALS AND PROCESSES, 2008, 27 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [34] A critical literature review on reuse and recycling of construction waste in construction industry
    Janani, R.
    Kaveri, V
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 37 : 3077 - 3081
  • [35] Waste foundry sand in concrete: A review
    Bhardwaj, Bavita
    Kumar, Pardeep
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 156 : 661 - 674
  • [36] Recycling of marine dredged materials, coal fly ash and waste foundry sand as lightweight aggregates
    Erdogan, Pembe Ozer
    Basar, Hatice Merve
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2019, 34 (03): : 1378 - 1394
  • [37] Waste minimization in the foundry industry
    Oman, D.E.
    Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1988, 38 (07): : 932 - 940
  • [38] Metallic characterization of foundry by-products per waste streams and leaching protocols
    Deng, An
    Tikalsky, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (06): : 586 - 595
  • [39] State-of-the-Art Review on Sustainability in Geotechnical Applications of Waste Foundry Sand
    Kumar, Ankit
    Parihar, Aditya
    INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 52 (02) : 416 - 436
  • [40] State-of-the-Art Review on Sustainability in Geotechnical Applications of Waste Foundry Sand
    Ankit Kumar
    Aditya Parihar
    Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2022, 52 : 416 - 436