Asset liability management modelling with risk control by stochastic dominance

被引:10
|
作者
Yang X. [1 ]
Gondzio J. [1 ]
Grothey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Optimization, School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh
关键词
asset liability management; stochastic dominance; stochastic programming; underfunding;
D O I
10.1057/jam.2010.8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An Asset Liability Management model with a novel strategy for controlling the risk of underfunding is presented in this article. The basic model involves multi-period decisions (portfolio rebalancing) and deals with the usual uncertainty of investment returns and future liabilities. Therefore, it is well suited to a stochastic programming approach. A stochastic dominance concept is applied to control the risk of underfunding through modelling a chance constraint. A small numerical example and an out-of-sample backtest are provided to demonstrate the advantages of this new model, which includes stochastic dominance constraints, over the basic model and a passive investment strategy. Adding stochastic dominance constraints comes with a price. This complicates the structure of the underlying stochastic program. Indeed, the new constraints create a link between variables associated with different scenarios of the same time stage. This destroys the usual tree structure of the constraint matrix in the stochastic program and prevents the application of standard stochastic programming approaches, such as (nested) Benders decomposition and progressive hedging. Instead, we apply a structure-exploiting interior point method to this problem. The specialized interior point solver, object-oriented parallel solver, can deal efficiently with such problems and outperforms the industrial strength commercial solver CPLEX on our test problem set. Computational results on medium-scale problems with sizes reaching about one million variables demonstrate the efficiency of the specialized solution technique. The solution time for these non-trivial asset liability models appears to grow sublinearly with the key parameters of the model, such as the number of assets and the number of realizations of the benchmark portfolio, which makes the method applicable to truly large-scale problems. © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 93
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asset and liability management in financial crisis
    Tektas, Arzu
    Ozkan-Gunay, E. Nur
    Gunay, Gokhan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2005, 6 (02) : 135 - 149
  • [42] Stochastic volatility implies fourth-degree risk dominance: Applications to asset pricing
    Gollier, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2018, 95 : 155 - 171
  • [43] A BANK ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT MODEL
    KUSY, MI
    ZIEMBA, WT
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (03) : 356 - 376
  • [44] Asset and liability management in retail banking
    Lewis, MK
    Morton, P
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT IN VOLATILE FINANCIAL MARKETS, 1996, 32 : 225 - +
  • [45] Asset liability management for individual households
    Dempster, M. A. H.
    Medova, E. A.
    [J]. BRITISH ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (02) : 405 - 439
  • [46] Massively Parallel Asset and Liability Management
    Grothey, Andreas
    [J]. EURO-PAR 2010 PARALLEL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, 2011, 6586 : 423 - 430
  • [47] Risk Control in Asset Management: Motives and Concepts
    Dangl, Thomas
    Randl, Otto
    Zechner, Josef
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN QUANTITATIVE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 99 : 239 - 266
  • [48] Strategic Asset Allocation for Life Insurers with Stochastic Liability
    Atkinson, C.
    Mokkhavesa, S.
    Ingpochai, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 12 (03): : 1315 - 1336
  • [49] A note on asset proportions, stochastic dominance, and the 50% rule
    Clark, E
    Jokung, O
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (12) : 1724 - 1727
  • [50] Stochastic dominance, Pareto optimality, and equilibrium asset pricing
    Kim, C
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1998, 65 (02): : 341 - 356