A Comparison of ML Models for Predicting Congestion in Urban Cities

被引:0
|
作者
Gitanjali Deepika
机构
[1] DCRUST,Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
来源
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research | 2024年 / 22卷
关键词
Congestion; ML models; Detrending; Optimization; Traffic prediction; XGBoost;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study predicts traffic congestion in four US cities using various machine learning models. The research utilizes different regression-based models to predict congestion. Results from various models are presented, emphasizing their individual performances in terms of common evaluation metrics. XGBoost is applied with detrending and optimization to enhance predictive accuracy for MSE, MAE, and the coefficient of determination The proposed model demonstrates the lowest MAE (6.39), and achieves the lowest RMSE (10.99), showcasing the variability in model effectiveness. Additionally, we explore the sensitivity of selected features, shedding light on their impact on model results and contributing to a better understanding of our predictive approach. Coefficients of determination across all models indicate diverse predictive capabilities. Analysis is conducted on the performances of various models, providing a robust showcase of their individual strengths and weaknesses across commonly used evaluation metrics. The implicit problem background highlights the inadequacies in existing traffic flow prediction methodologies, prompting the introduction of innovative approaches. These findings are the first of their kind for traffic flow prediction in urban freeways of four US cities using this approach. The research holds significance for intelligent transportation management systems and urban planning. This research introduces an innovative prediction approach and showcases performance variations among different models. The practical applications extend to reducing travel times, addressing environmental concerns, and aiding decision-making for congestion alleviation and improved overall traffic flow. In conclusion, this research bridges critical gaps in traffic prediction methodologies, offering valuable insights and applications for urban planning and intelligent transportation systems.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First specifications of Urban Traffic-Congestion Forecasting Models
    Daissaoui, Abdellah
    Boulmakoul, Azedine
    Habbas, Zineb
    2015 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONICS (ICM), 2015, : 249 - 252
  • [32] Functional Urban Regions of the Largest Slovak Cities in the Models of Urban Development
    Novotny, Ladislav
    GEOGRAPHIA CASSOVIENSIS, 2011, 5 (02): : 93 - 102
  • [33] Comparison of three empirical models of airport congestion pricing
    Daniel, JI
    Pahwa, M
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2000, 47 (01) : 1 - 38
  • [34] Constructing compact cities: How urban regeneration can enhance growth and relieve congestion
    Li, Jiewei
    Lu, Ming
    Lu, Tianyi
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 113
  • [35] URBAN SMARTNESS VS URBAN COMPETITIVENESS A COMPARISON OF ITALIAN CITIES RANKINGS
    Papa, Rocco
    Gargiulo, Carmela
    Franco, Stefano
    Russo, Laura
    TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, : 771 - 782
  • [36] The Spatial Effect of Shared Mobility on Urban Traffic Congestion: Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Li, Jiachen
    Ma, Mengqing
    Xia, Xin
    Ren, Wenhui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [37] COMPARISON OF URBAN TRAFFIC MODELS
    BIROS, JF
    DESFORGES, O
    DUCORNET, D
    GABARD, JF
    RAIRO-AUTOMATIQUE-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND CONTROL, 1979, 13 (01): : 93 - 107
  • [38] Urban growth models. An application to American cities
    Dentinho, Tomaz Ponce
    Reid, Neil
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [39] OPTUNA optimization for predicting chemical respiratory toxicity using ML models
    Eman Shehab
    Hamada Nayel
    Mohamed Taha
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2025, 39 (1)
  • [40] Congestion, agglomeration, and the structure of cities
    Brinkman, Jeffrey C.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 94 : 13 - 31