OECD: One or Many? Ranking Countries with a Composite Well-Being Indicator

被引:0
|
作者
Jesús Peiró-Palomino
Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo
机构
[1] University Jaume I,Department of Economics and INTECO Joint Research Unit
[2] University of Valencia,Department of Applied Economics II and INTECO Joint Research Unit
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2018年 / 139卷
关键词
Composite indicators; Hierarchical cluster analysis; -; -; -; OECD ; Well-being; C14; C61; I31;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a composite indicator of well-being for the 35 OECD countries, as well as South Africa, Russia and Brazil for the period 2013–2016, considering data on 10 different well-being domains from the OECD Better Life Index. In a first stage, countries are ranked according to their well-being indicator, constructed combining Data Envelopment Analysis with the Benefit-of-the-Doubt principle and Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making techniques. In a second stage, well-being clubs are identified using hierarchical cluster analysis, revealing that well-being is highly polarised. Moreover, as well-being affects people, population size is accounted for in the cluster analysis, showing that for the largest proportion of people in our sample, well-being is remarkably low.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 869
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条