Advancing chemical risk assessment decision-making with population variability data: challenges and opportunities

被引:0
|
作者
Weihsueh A. Chiu
Ivan Rusyn
机构
[1] Texas A&M University,Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
来源
Mammalian Genome | 2018年 / 29卷
关键词
Dose-response Assessment; Human Variability; Collaborative Cross (CC); Hazard Identification; Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel (HMDP);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Characterizing population variability, including identifying susceptible populations and quantifying their increased susceptibility, is an important aspect of chemical risk assessment, but one that is challenging with traditional experimental models and risk assessment methods. New models and methods to address population variability can be used to advance the human health assessments of chemicals in three key areas. First, with respect to hazard identification, evaluating toxicity using population-based in vitro and in vivo models can potentially reduce both false positive and false negative signals. Second, with respect to evaluating mechanisms of toxicity, enhanced ability to do genetic mapping using these models allows for the identification of key biological pathways and mechanisms that may be involved in toxicity and/or susceptibility. Third, with respect to dose–response assessment, population-based toxicity data can serve as a surrogate for human variability, and thus be used to quantitatively estimate the degree of human toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic variability and thereby increase confidence in setting health-protective exposure limits. A number of case studies have been published that demonstrate the potential opportunities for improving risk assessment and decision-making, and include studies using Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred mice, as well as populations of human cell lines from the 1000 Genomes project. Key challenges include the need to apply more sophisticated computational and statistical models analyzing population-based toxicity data, and the need to integrate these more complex analyses into risk assessments and decision-making.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:182 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk, Decision-making and Assessment in Child Welfare
    McCafferty, Paul
    Taylor, Brian
    CHILD CARE IN PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [22] Ecological risk assessment: An input for decision-making
    VanLeeuwen, CJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 21 (06) : 812 - 816
  • [23] A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment
    Balmat, Jean-Francois
    Lafont, Frederic
    Maifret, Robert
    Pessel, Nathalie
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (01) : 171 - 176
  • [24] Risk assessment in decision-making on rainfed cotton
    Crétenet, M
    Mohtar, RH
    Moussa, AA
    CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2006, 15 (01): : 109 - 115
  • [25] Tunnel safety, risk assessment and decision-making
    Beard, Alan N.
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [26] USE OF RISK ASSESSMENT IN REGULATORY DECISION-MAKING
    SMITH, MV
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 38 (10) : 113 - 118
  • [27] RISK ASSESSMENT AND CLINICAL AEROMEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    CLARK, JB
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1993, 64 (08): : 741 - 747
  • [28] VIEWS ON DECISION-MAKING USING RISK ASSESSMENT
    BIRKHOFER, A
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 35 (NOV): : 403 - 403
  • [29] DATA-DRIVEN ASSESSMENT AND DECISION-MAKING
    CRAWFORD, SL
    FUNG, RM
    TSE, E
    EXPERT SYSTEMS IN ECONOMICS, BANKING AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, : 399 - 408
  • [30] Uses of NHANES Biomarker Data for Chemical Risk Assessment: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Sobus, Jon R.
    DeWoskin, Robert S.
    Tan, Yu-Mei
    Pleil, Joachim D.
    Phillips, Martin Blake
    George, Barbara Jane
    Christensen, Krista
    Schreinemachers, Dina M.
    Williams, Marc A.
    Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
    Edwards, Stephen W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 123 (10) : 919 - 927