Local and Global Error Models to Improve Uncertainty Quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Laureline Josset
Ivan Lunati
机构
[1] University of Lausanne,CRET
来源
Mathematical Geosciences | 2013年 / 45卷
关键词
Multiscale finite volume; Distance kernel method; Stochastic simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In groundwater applications, Monte Carlo methods are employed to model the uncertainty on geological parameters. However, their brute-force application becomes computationally prohibitive for highly detailed geological descriptions, complex physical processes, and a large number of realizations. The Distance Kernel Method (DKM) overcomes this issue by clustering the realizations in a multidimensional space based on the flow responses obtained by means of an approximate (computationally cheaper) model; then, the uncertainty is estimated from the exact responses that are computed only for one representative realization per cluster (the medoid). Usually, DKM is employed to decrease the size of the sample of realizations that are considered to estimate the uncertainty. We propose to use the information from the approximate responses for uncertainty quantification. The subset of exact solutions provided by DKM is then employed to construct an error model and correct the potential bias of the approximate model. Two error models are devised that both employ the difference between approximate and exact medoid solutions, but differ in the way medoid errors are interpolated to correct the whole set of realizations. The Local Error Model rests upon the clustering defined by DKM and can be seen as a natural way to account for intra-cluster variability; the Global Error Model employs a linear interpolation of all medoid errors regardless of the cluster to which the single realization belongs. These error models are evaluated for an idealized pollution problem in which the uncertainty of the breakthrough curve needs to be estimated. For this numerical test case, we demonstrate that the error models improve the uncertainty quantification provided by the DKM algorithm and are effective in correcting the bias of the estimate computed solely from the MsFV results. The framework presented here is not specific to the methods considered and can be applied to other combinations of approximate models and techniques to select a subset of realizations.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 620
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local and Global Error Models to Improve Uncertainty Quantification
    Josset, Laureline
    Lunati, Ivan
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 45 (05) : 601 - 620
  • [2] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models
    Harenberg, Daniel
    Marelli, Stefano
    Sudret, Bruno
    Winschel, Viktor
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 10 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [3] ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    Liang, Bin
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2011, 1 (02) : 147 - 161
  • [4] Global sensitivity analysis for uncertainty quantification in fire spread models
    Ujjwal, K. C.
    Aryal, Jagannath
    Garg, Saurabh
    Hilton, James
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2021, 143
  • [5] Impact of runoff measurement error models on the quantification of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff models
    Thyer, M. A.
    Renard, B.
    Kavetski, D.
    Kuczera, G.
    [J]. 18TH WORLD IMACS CONGRESS AND MODSIM09 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: INTERFACING MODELLING AND SIMULATION WITH MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 3414 - 3420
  • [6] The influence of numerical error on parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification for advective PDE models
    Nardini, John T.
    Bortz, D. M.
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2019, 35 (06)
  • [7] Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models
    Stange, Jens
    Bodnar, Taras
    Dickhaus, Thorsten
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 99 (03) : 281 - 310
  • [8] Quantification of prediction uncertainty using imperfect subsurface models with model error estimation
    Rammay, Muzammil Hussain
    Elsheikh, Ahmed H.
    Chen, Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 576 : 764 - 783
  • [9] Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models
    Jens Stange
    Taras Bodnar
    Thorsten Dickhaus
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2015, 99 : 281 - 310
  • [10] Global Sensitivity Analysis and Estimation of Model Error, Toward Uncertainty Quantification in Scramjet Computations
    Huan, Xun
    Safta, Cosmin
    Sargsyan, Khachik
    Geraci, Gianluca
    Eldred, Michael S.
    Vane, Zachary P.
    Lacaze, Guilhem
    Oefelein, Joseph C.
    Najm, Habib N.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (03) : 1170 - 1184