Dynamic increase factor for pushdown analysis of seismically designed steel moment-resisting frames

被引:0
|
作者
Massimiliano Ferraioli
机构
[1] Second University of Naples,Department of Civil Engineering, Design, Building and Environment
关键词
progressive collapse; nonlinear pushdown analysis; dynamic increase factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The independent threat scenario of sudden column loss under localised damage is usually considered in progressive collapse assessment. The effect of the sudden removal of a column is like the sudden application of the gravity load on the structure when significant deformations occur. This conventional approach is based on the simplifying but realistic hypothesis that the peak dynamic response can be assessed with reasonable accuracy using the nonlinear static response. In this approach, amplified gravity loads are applied to the bays that are affected by the removed column to compensate for the dynamic effects corresponding to the real load redistribution. The paper investigates the dynamic increase factor to be considered in the nonlinear pushdown analysis of seismically designed steel moment-resisting frames. The influence of the fundamental parameters involved in progressive collapse analysis was highlighted. The effect of various design variables, such as the number of stories, the number of bays, the location of the removed column and the level of seismic design load was investigated. The dynamic increase factor was estimated in a way to generate the best match of the peak dynamic responses through the nonlinear static analysis. Finally, the values obtained were expressed as a function of the vertical displacement at the location of the removed column and then compared with the GSA formulation based on the ductility factor.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 875
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT-RESISTING STEEL FRAMES - ANALYTICAL STUDY
    ROEDER, CW
    SCHNEIDER, SP
    CARPENTER, JE
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (06): : 1866 - 1884
  • [42] The seismic behaviour of steel moment-resisting frames with stiffening braces
    Martinelli, L
    Mulas, MG
    Perotti, F
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1998, 20 (12) : 1045 - 1062
  • [43] The seismic response of concentrically braced moment-resisting steel frames
    Dept of Structural Eng, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy
    Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 11 (1275-1299):
  • [44] Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed three-dimensional special moment resisting frames
    Pujari A.B.
    Sangle K.K.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 24 (6) : 1583 - 1597
  • [45] Simplified non-linear dynamic response analysis on moment-resisting frames
    Ohi, K
    Ito, T
    STESSA 2003: BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2003, : 533 - 540
  • [46] 13.13: Earthquake loss assessment of steel moment-resisting frames designed according to EC8
    Macedo, Luís
    Castro, José Miguel
    ce/papers, 2017, 1 (2-3) : 3801 - 3810
  • [47] Energy based methods and time hystory response analysis for behavior factor evaluation of moment-resisting steel frames
    Milev, J
    Petkov, ZB
    Sotirov, P
    Rangelov, N
    Georgiev, T
    STABILITY AND DUCTILITY OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 1999, : 421 - 428
  • [48] Evaluation of modified nonlinear dynamic and static analyses for seismic behavior of steel moment-resisting frames
    Eghbali, Mahdi
    Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati
    Dehkordi, Morteza Raissi
    JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING, 2015, 17 (08) : 4313 - 4324
  • [49] Progressive Sidesway Collapse Analysis of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Under Earthquake Excitations
    Kourosh Mehdizadeh
    Abbas Karamodin
    Abbasali Sadeghi
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2020, 44 : 1209 - 1221
  • [50] Progressive Sidesway Collapse Analysis of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Under Earthquake Excitations
    Mehdizadeh, Kourosh
    Karamodin, Abbas
    Sadeghi, Abbasali
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 44 (04) : 1209 - 1221