Earthquake early warning for the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake: performance evaluation of the current system and the next-generation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency

被引:0
|
作者
Yuki Kodera
Jun Saitou
Naoki Hayashimoto
Shimpei Adachi
Masahiko Morimoto
Yuji Nishimae
Mitsuyuki Hoshiba
机构
[1] Japan Meteorological Agency,Meteorological Research Institute
[2] Japan Meteorological Agency,Seismology and Volcanology Department
来源
关键词
Earthquake early warning; 2016 Kumamoto earthquake; Integrated particle filter method; Propagation of local undamped motion method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake (Kumamoto earthquake sequence) is an extremely high-seismicity event that has been occurring across Kumamoto and Oita Prefectures in Japan since April 14, 2016 (JST). The earthquake early warning system of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) issued warnings for 19 events in the Kumamoto earthquake sequence from April 14 to 19, under some of the heaviest loading conditions since the system began operating in 2007. We analyzed the system performance for cases where a warning was issued and/or strong motion was actually observed. The results indicated that the system exhibited remarkable performance, especially for the most destructive earthquakes in the Kumamoto earthquake sequence. In addition, the system did not miss or seriously under-predict strong motion of any large earthquake from April 14 to 30. However, in four cases, the system issued over-predicted warnings due to the simultaneous occurrence of small earthquakes within a short distance, which implies a fundamental obstacle in trigger-data classifications based solely on arrival time. We also performed simulations using the integrated particle filter (IPF) and propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM) methods, which JMA plans to implement to address over-prediction for multiple simultaneous earthquakes and under-prediction for massive earthquakes with large rupture zones. The simulation results of the IPF method indicated that the IPF method is highly effective at minimizing over-prediction even for multiple simultaneous earthquakes within a short distance, since it adopts a trigger-data classification using velocity amplitude and hypocenter determinations using not-yet-arrived data. The simulation results of the PLUM method demonstrated that the PLUM method is capable of issuing warnings for destructive inland earthquakes more rapidly than the current system owing to the use of additional seismometers that can only be incorporated by this method.Graphical abstract.[graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Realization of an Earthquake Early Warning System for Schools and Its Performance during the 2019 ML 6.3 Hualien (Taiwan) Earthquake
    Hsu, Ting-Yu
    Kuo, Chun-Hsiang
    Wang, Hsiu-Hsien
    Chang, Yu-Wen
    Lin, Pei-Yang
    Wen, Kuo-Liang
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 92 (01) : 342 - 351
  • [32] Applying Agile Methods in Designing an Earthquake and Landslide Early Warning System Application for Android
    Heryana, Ana
    Nugraheni, Ekasari
    Kusumo, Budiarianto
    Rojie, Andri Fahrur
    Setiadi, Bambang
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, CONTROL, INFORMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IC3INA), 2017, : 80 - 84
  • [33] Performance test of pilot Earthquake Early Warning system in western Java']Java, Indonesia
    Rudyanto, Ariska
    Wijaya, Angga
    Widiyantoro, Sri
    Sahara, David P.
    Rosalia, Shindy
    Wibowo, Adi
    Pramono, Sigit
    Putra, Ade Surya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2024, 115
  • [34] "Shaking in 5 Seconds!"-Performance and User Appreciation Assessment of the Earthquake Network Smartphone-Based Public Earthquake Early Warning System
    Bossu, Remy
    Finazzi, Francesco
    Steed, Robert
    Fallou, Laure
    Bondar, Istvan
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 93 (01) : 137 - 148
  • [35] SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger astronomy
    Al Kharusi, S.
    BenZvi, S. Y.
    Bobowski, J. S.
    Bonivento, W.
    Brdar, V
    Brunner, T.
    Caden, E.
    Clark, M.
    Coleiro, A.
    Colomer-Molla, M.
    Crespo-Anadon, J., I
    Depoian, A.
    Dornic, D.
    Fischer, V
    Franco, D.
    Fulgione, W.
    Gallo Rosso, A.
    Geske, M.
    Griswold, S.
    Gromov, M.
    Haggard, D.
    Habig, A.
    Halim, O.
    Higuera, A.
    Hill, R.
    Horiuchi, S.
    Ishidoshiro, K.
    Kato, C.
    Katsavounidis, E.
    Khaitan, D.
    Kneller, J. P.
    Kopec, A.
    Kulikovskiy, V
    Lai, M.
    Lamoureux, M.
    Lang, R. F.
    Li, H. L.
    Lincetto, M.
    Lunardini, C.
    Migenda, J.
    Milisavljevic, D.
    McCarthy, M. E.
    Connor, E.
    Sullivan, E.
    Pagliaroli, G.
    Patel, D.
    Peres, R.
    Pointon, B. W.
    Qin, J.
    Raj, N.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (03):
  • [36] Performance of a Network-Based Earthquake Early Warning System in the Ibero-Maghrebian Region
    Carranza, M.
    Buforn, E.
    Zollo, A.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 88 (06) : 1499 - 1507
  • [37] Field investigation and seismic performance evaluation by nonlinear analysis of an r/c building with secondary walls damaged by the 2016 kumamoto earthquake
    Suzuki T.
    Sanada Y.
    Choi H.
    1663, Architectural Institute of Japan (82): : 1663 - 1673
  • [38] Performance of a Hybrid Demonstration Earthquake Early Warning System in the Sichuan-Yunnan Border Region
    Peng, Chaoyong
    Ma, Qiang
    Jiang, Peng
    Huang, Wenhui
    Yang, Dake
    Peng, Hanshu
    Chen, Liang
    Yang, Jiansi
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 91 (02) : 835 - 846
  • [39] Performance evaluation on power control and diversity of next-generation CDMA system
    Mizuguchi, H
    Aoyama, A
    Yoshida, S
    Ushirokawa, A
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1998, E81B (07) : 1345 - 1354
  • [40] Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System Against the CWB System During the 6 February 2018 Mw6.2 Hualien Earthquake
    Hsu, T. Y.
    Lin, P. Y.
    Wang, H. H.
    Chiang, H. W.
    Chang, Y. W.
    Kuo, C. H.
    Lin, C. M.
    Wen, K. L.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (12) : 6001 - 6007