Interpreting ‘favourable conservation status’ for large carnivores in Europe: how many are needed and how many are wanted?

被引:0
|
作者
Arie Trouwborst
Luigi Boitani
John D. C. Linnell
机构
[1] Tilburg University,Department of European & International Law, Tilburg Law School
[2] University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’,Department of Biology and Biotechnology
[3] Norwegian Institute for Nature Research,undefined
来源
关键词
Favourable conservation status; FCS; Habitats Directive; Large carnivores; Law; Transboundary cooperation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The EU Habitats Directive is a key biodiversity conservation instrument. It contains legal obligations for the 28 EU member states in order to safeguard a ‘favourable conservation status’ (FCS) for selected species and habitat types. The crucial FCS concept itself, however, remains subject to considerable confusion regarding its proper interpretation and operationalization, impairing the Directive’s effective implementation. Diminishing this confusion is the purpose of this review. It focuses specifically on large carnivores—wolf (Canis lupus), brown bear (Ursus arctos), Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) and wolverine (Gulo gulo). These pose particular challenges, given their low densities, transboundary populations, and human-wildlife conflict potential. Large carnivores are also the only species for which specific guidance has been adopted by the European Commission—and subsequently contested. Our methodology combines legal analysis with an understanding of the species’ ecology and associated social, economic and cultural dimensions. We analyze the methods and processes through which EU law is interpreted, implemented, and enforced, by member states, European Commission, and EU Court of Justice—which is the ultimate authority regarding EU law interpretation. On that basis, we engage three particularly complex interpretation questions which are also of great practical significance: (1) the appropriate scale to achieve FCS (national or transboundary population level); (2) the respective roles of demographic, genetic and ecological factors in determining FCS; and (3) the use of extinction versus carrying capacity as benchmark. Regarding these questions, we identify approaches that are workable and effective, as well as likely to be endorsed by the EU Court.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 61
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Many Founders, How Large a Population?
    Willis, Kevin
    Willis, Raymond E.
    ZOO BIOLOGY, 2010, 29 (05) : 638 - 646
  • [22] HOW MANY 1S ARE NEEDED
    RAWSTHORNE, DA
    FIBONACCI QUARTERLY, 1989, 27 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [23] How many grains are needed for a provenance study?
    Vermeesch, P
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 224 (3-4) : 441 - 451
  • [24] How many query superpositions are needed to learn?
    Castro, Jorge
    ALGORITHMIC LEARNING THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4264 : 78 - 92
  • [25] How many samples are needed to leverage smoothness?
    Cabannes, Vivien
    Vigogna, Stefano
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [26] How Many Days of Pedometer Monitoring Are Needed?
    Aoyagi, Yukitoshi
    Shephard, Roy J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2009, 41 (03): : 734 - 734
  • [27] How many photons are needed for FRET imaging?
    Esposito, Alessandro
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2020, 11 (02) : 1186 - 1202
  • [28] How Many Interventions Are Needed Is Unknown Reply
    Schneider, Antonius
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 119 (03): : 40 - 40
  • [29] How Many Labeled License Plates Are Needed?
    Wu, Changhao
    Xu, Shugong
    Song, Guocong
    Zhang, Shunqing
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND COMPUTER VISION (PRCV 2018), PT IV, 2018, 11259 : 334 - 346
  • [30] HOW MANY SIMPLICES ARE NEEDED TO TRIANGULATE A GRASSMANNIAN?
    Govc, Dejan
    Marzantowicz, Waclaw
    Pavesic, Petar
    TOPOLOGICAL METHODS IN NONLINEAR ANALYSIS, 2020, 56 (02) : 501 - 518