Applying the ethics of AI: a systematic review of tools for developing and assessing AI-based systems

被引:2
|
作者
Ortega-Bolanos, Ricardo [1 ]
Bernal-Salcedo, Joshua [1 ]
Ortiz, Mariana German [3 ,7 ]
Sarmiento, Julian Galeano [2 ]
Ruz, Gonzalo A. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Tabares-Soto, Reinel [1 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Manizales, Elect & Automat Dept, Manizales 170001, Caldas, Colombia
[2] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Math & Stat, Manizales 170001, Caldas, Colombia
[3] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Engn & Sci, Santiago 7941169, Chile
[4] Univ Caldas, Dept Syst & Informat, Manizales 170001, Caldas, Colombia
[5] Ctr Appl Ecol & Sustainabil CAPES, Santiago 8331150, Chile
[6] Data Observ Fdn, Santiago 7510277, Chile
[7] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Sch Govt, GobLab, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Responsible development; Governance; Ethics of AI; Machine learning; AI life cycle; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; DILEMMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-024-10740-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based systems and their increasingly common use have made it a ubiquitous technology; Machine Learning algorithms are present in streaming services, social networks, and in the health sector. However, implementing this emerging technology carries significant social and ethical risks and implications. Without ethical development of such systems, there is the potential for this technology to undermine people's autonomy, privacy, and equity, even affecting human rights. Considering the approaches necessary for ethical development and effective governance of AI, such as ethical principles, guidelines, and technical tools, the question arises regarding the limitations of implementing these measures by the highly technical personnel involved in the process. In this context, we propose the creation of a typology that distinguishes the different stages of the AI life-cycle, the high-level ethical principles that should govern their implementation, and the tools with the potential to foster compliance with these principles, encompassing both technical and conceptual resources. In addition, this typology will include relevant information such as developmental level, related tasks, sectors, and language. Our research is based on a systematic review in which we identified 352 resources and tools. We expect this contribution to be valuable in promoting ethical AI development for developers and leaders who manage these initiatives. The complete typology and the comprehensive list of resources are available for consultation at https://ricardo-ob.github.io/tools4responsibleai.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Software Engineering for AI-based systems: A survey
    Martínez-Fernández, Silverio
    Bogner, Justus
    Franch, Xavier
    Oriol, Marc
    Siebert, Julien
    Trendowicz, Adam
    Vollmer, Anna Maria
    Wagner, Stefan
    [J]. arXiv, 2021,
  • [42] Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey
    Martinez-Fernandez, Silverio
    Bogner, Justus
    Franch, Xavier
    Oriol, Marc
    Siebert, Julien
    Trendowicz, Adam
    Vollmer, Anna Maria
    Wagner, Stefan
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND METHODOLOGY, 2022, 31 (02)
  • [43] AI-Based Environmental Monitoring with UAV Systems
    Bakirman, Tolga
    [J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2022, 88 (02):
  • [44] AI-based fog and edge computing: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions
    Iftikhar, Sundas
    Gill, Sukhpal Singh
    Song, Chenghao
    Xu, Minxian
    Aslanpour, Mohammad Sadegh
    Toosi, Adel N.
    Du, Junhui
    Wu, Huaming
    Ghosh, Shreya
    Chowdhury, Deepraj
    Golec, Muhammed
    Kumar, Mohit
    Abdelmoniem, Ahmed M.
    Cuadrado, Felix
    Varghese, Blesson
    Rana, Omer
    Dustdar, Schahram
    Uhlig, Steve
    [J]. INTERNET OF THINGS, 2023, 21
  • [45] Characterizing Technical Debt and Antipatterns in AI-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study
    Bogner, Justus
    Verdecchia, Roberto
    Gerostathopoulos, Ilias
    [J]. 2021 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNICAL DEBT (TECHDEBT 2021), 2021, : 64 - 73
  • [46] AI-based & heuristic workflow scheduling in cloud and fog computing: a systematic review
    Khaledian, Navid
    Voelp, Marcus
    Azizi, Sadoon
    Shirvani, Mirsaeid Hosseini
    [J]. CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 27 (08): : 10265 - 10298
  • [47] AI4IO: A suite of AI-based tools for IO-aware scheduling
    Wyatt, Michael R., II
    Herbein, Stephen
    Gamblin, Todd
    Taufer, Michela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, 2022, 36 (03): : 370 - 387
  • [48] Nurse practitioners' involvement and experience with AI-based health technologies: A systematic review
    Raymond, Louis
    Castonguay, Alexandre
    Doyon, Odette
    Pare, Guy
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 66
  • [49] AI-based carcinoma detection and classification using histopathological images: A systematic review
    Prabhu, Swathi
    Prasad, Keerthana
    Robels-Kelly, Antonio
    Lu, Xuequan
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 142
  • [50] Review on the use of AI-based methods and tools for treating mental conditions and mental rehabilitation
    Khorev, Vladimir
    Kiselev, Anton
    Badarin, Artem
    Antipov, Vladimir
    Drapkina, Oxana
    Kurkin, Semen
    Hramov, Alexander
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2024,