Differences in Audiotaped Versus Videotaped Physician-Patient Interactions

被引:0
|
作者
Dawn L. Riddle
Terrance L. Albrecht
Michael D. Coovert
Louis A. Penner
John C. Ruckdeschel
Christina G. Blanchard
Gwendolyn Quinn
Daniel Urbizu
机构
[1] University of South Florida,Medical Interaction Research Group. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at the
[2] MRC-CANCONT,Medical Interaction Research Group, Moffitt Cancer Center
[3] University of South Florida College of Medicine,Medical Interaction Research Group, Moffitt Cancer Center
[4] University of South Florida,Medical Interaction Research Group
[5] Moffitt Cancer Center,Medical Interaction Research Group and Project Link
[6] Moffitt Cancer Center,undefined
来源
关键词
analysis; audiotaped; interactions; validity; videotaped;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient interactions were analyzed using the same coding systems to judge audio-only versus video-based data formats. All coding conditions demonstrated acceptable reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficients. However, MANOVA analyses show that ratings of audiotaped physician-patient interactions are not equivalent to ratings of videotaped encounters. Exploratory factor analyses show differences in the underlying structures of the data derived from the audio-only versus the video information. The differences in the video-based factor solutions account for more total variance and are more consistent with theoretical expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 239
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条